No, my criticism is that he's nothing more than a hack and shouldn't be getting sent up to bat instead of proper batsmen like Kohli, Dhoni and Yuvraj.Your criticism of Yusuf here is that he's not someone who performs when he comes in with easy runs on the offering.
If he performed in the inverse, i.e. only scored in these situations, he'd be criticised.
like duhSo you're telling me my opinion is wrong?
You're entitled to it, but as Jono said, it isn't backed up by facts.So you're telling me my opinion is wrong?
Lol, righto I think this discussion is going nowhere then.So you're telling me my opinion is wrong?
I agree.Lol, righto I think this discussion is going nowhere then.
With regards to India, I think Dhoni needs to use Munaf better. I personally think if he's bowling tight early on, keep him going. Yes that'll expose us at the death if we only have two seam bowlers, but it's not like Munaf's length bowling works at the death anyway. Better to get 4-4.5 rpo for 7 overs off Munaf IMO.
Ganguly disagrees with youI agree.
If the game is going to be really really close in the end then you need the best bowler to keep things extremely tight in the death overs. I personally would prefer Zaheer to bowl the 47th and 49th over.
.
That's what I meant. When I say 47th and 49th, I mean 47.1 - 47.6 (48) & 49.1 - 49.6 (50). Someone else can bowl 48.1 - 48.6 (49) over.Ganguly disagrees with you
India does not deserve brickbats for SA loss: Ganguly | Sport | DAWN.COM
He says that in all matches Zaheer should bowl the 48th and 50th overs come what may.
Yes, I agree. Munaf should be bowled out earlier. And Harbhajan should be used in the last 5 or so overs with Zaheer. Regardless of all the criticism of Harbhajan's wicket drought, I think he is a street smart LO bowler and one indispensable member of Indian XI.Lol, righto I think this discussion is going nowhere then.
With regards to India, I think Dhoni needs to use Munaf better. I personally think if he's bowling tight early on, keep him going. Yes that'll expose us at the death if we only have two seam bowlers, but it's not like Munaf's length bowling works at the death anyway. Better to get 4-4.5 rpo for 7 overs off Munaf IMO.
Bhajji the indispensableYes, I agree. Munaf should be bowled out earlier. And Harbhajan should be used in the last 5 or so overs with Zaheer. Regardless of all the criticism of Harbhajan's wicket drought, I think he is a street smart LO bowler and one indispensable member of Indian XI.
Actually it is only the last 10 overs that I would be worried about. They have squandered opportunities against England, SA, and now today against WI.I am worried now. I wasn't so much after the England and SA matches, but now I am seriously worried. The 'great' Indian batting lineup would be seriously short of confidence after their performance against WI.