Didn't Clarke make a big deal of Broad not walking after nicking to slip?
This must've solidified his case for the captaincy.
underrated post this.Always been good at converting 2s to 3s
I've seen some short highlight packages of the innings on twitter, he was sawn off by a bad decision too.Sachin Tendulkar Hails His 43-ball 44 Against West Indies In 1997 As One Of The Most Cherished Knock Of His ODI Career
Sachin Tendulkar, in a recent interview with cricket.com, hailed his 43-ball 44 at the Port of Spain in 1997 as one of the most cherished knocks of his 24-year-old career.cricketaddictor.com
I recall watching this game. It was as if Tendulkar was playing on a different surface to others.
Can they convert it to a boundary though ?Always been good at converting 2s to 3s
Remembering another gem. 45 against SA just 2 months prior to this.Sachin Tendulkar Hails His 43-ball 44 Against West Indies In 1997 As One Of The Most Cherished Knock Of His ODI Career
Sachin Tendulkar, in a recent interview with cricket.com, hailed his 43-ball 44 at the Port of Spain in 1997 as one of the most cherished knocks of his 24-year-old career.cricketaddictor.com
I recall watching this game. It was as if Tendulkar was playing on a different surface to others.
Yes, this was so so good. Batting porn. One of his finest counter attack against great attack in SA too. Those were the days when wicket of Tendulkar often meant curtains. Despite a good knock from Dravid, India faltered big time in last 8 or so overs.Remembering another gem. 45 against SA just 2 months prior to this.
Cronje again. It was always ****ing Cronje. Great field placement though, pretty mediocre delivery.Remembering another gem. 45 against SA just 2 months prior to this.
Smashed Pollock and Donald too.Yeah but I rank the Windies one higher. Tougher to smack around that attack than Rudi Bryson.
The Windies foursome was a better attack, Ankit. Come on. ?Smashed Pollock and Donald too.
Donald got 4/32 in 10 overs in that semi. Cannot be terming him a WC knockout choker. It has to be based on his bowling and not batting.Tbh, there were a few so called WC knockout chokers there. Tendulkar, Donald to name a couple. So one of them had to succeed when up against each other
I wasn't serious about it. Was just having a laughDonald got 4/32 in 10 overs in that semi. Cannot be terming him a WC knockout choker. It has to be based on his bowling and not batting.
Anyways, it is a very very ambiguous measure coined by Burgey to bash anyone but the Australians but now prevalently being used by others as well.