With that batting line up?warnie would be captain, he'd still be slaying shielas, and we would still be winners.
batting doesnt win matches, bowling does.With that batting line up?
This.He would have still retired after Ashes 2006-2007.
Dunno if he'd have lasted that long, presumably he'd have been captain in both formats, reckon that his career would have been shorter if he'd continued with ODIs.He would have still retired after Ashes 2006-2007.
Waugh was still test skipper when that happened though.He'd have been ****ed when caught doing a banned diuretic, and Australian cricket would have looked worse.
Exactly!His captaincy wouldn't have been as over-rated as it is.
edit: when did Ponting take the ODI reigns from Waugh?
I honestly haven't watched enough games he's captained to really have an opinion but I've always got the impression that his reputation has been properly enhanced by not captaining at the top level, and based off very little.Exactly!
His captaincy is the biggest myth in cricket. Sooo, so overrated.
Fair point, Chris Tremlett is one player who Warne, for whatever reason, didn't get the best out of under his captaincy.Reckon he would've alienated a number of players, tbh. Players always seem to be saying that Ponting is someone they can get behind and a good leader of men; I reckon that with his more confrontational style, Shane would've been a bit more divisive in the dressng room.
Hmm, have any Aussies come out and said they disliked playing with him (or something similar)?Reckon he would've alienated a number of players, tbh. Players always seem to be saying that Ponting is someone they can get behind and a good leader of men; I reckon that with his more confrontational style, Shane would've been a bit more divisive in the dressng room.