One of the few times when you have extreme logic . He is unfit now a days . He was one of the once in a while few reliable batsmen in Pakistan .......ReallyCrazy said:i think taufeeq umer is better than farhat.
.....
. is salim elahi completely out of the picture?? also there was danish kaneria, or is he only in the side for tests?FRAZ said:He is a Pakistani Batsman . Immense talent with upstair cavity ...
Rana bowls very well in his first spell but cannot bowl in the death. He almost always provides early breakthroughs.... probably wont be in the team when Shabbir's back thoughArjun said:Why is Naved-ul-Hasan in this team? He's only a bits-and-pieces player! Maybe Azhar Mahmood can be brought back- he did a good job as a strike bowler, at least once, in an ODI, and he can bat quite well.
A lot was said about someone named Rauf. What's he like?
err they finally gave up on him following failure after failure?Arjun said:What happened to Imran Nazir?
Likewise Saqlain I believe?Tony Blade said:Gul's injured
yes now im convinced azhar mahmood should be brought back!Arjun said:Why is Naved-ul-Hasan in this team? He's only a bits-and-pieces player! Maybe Azhar Mahmood can be brought back- he did a good job as a strike bowler, at least once, in an ODI, and he can bat quite well.
Mahmood isn't too bad as a strike bowler- he did quite well in England, although that was a single ODI. He has a few 5-wicket hauls in ODI's, and a Test century, so he isn't too bad.tooextracool said:yes now im convinced azhar mahmood should be brought back!
seriously how someone can suggest that a team shouldnt pick a bits and pieces player, and then bring up azhar mahmood as a candidate for selection is truly baffling.....
But quite often, we see scores of 3/72 (including an over where 17 runs were scored of 1 ball) and 2/82 against Zimbabwe- this present Zim team. He's not a contender for a strike bowler, is he?Tony Blade said:Rana bowls very well in his first spell but cannot bowl in the death. He almost always provides early breakthroughs.... probably wont be in the team when Shabbir's back though
Not too many failures, but they change their openers a little too frequently.tooextracool said:err they finally gave up on him following failure after failure?
so now we should pick people bases on what they have done in a single ODI then?Arjun said:Mahmood isn't too bad as a strike bowler- he did quite well in England, although that was a single ODI.
and his oh so brilliant averages of 17 and 38 @ 4.59 in the bowling and batting department. you'd be better off with afridi than azhar mahmood.Arjun said:He has a few 5-wicket hauls in ODI's, and a Test century, so he isn't too bad..
not too many failures???Arjun said:Not too many failures, but they change their openers a little too frequently.
*Cough* Michael Vaughan *Cough*tooextracool said:seriously how many more games than 61 can you give a guy who averages 23?