honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
IT will also impact the umpires adversely, which is the bigger issue IMO. It can create mental scars, even.
and each of those armchair complaints about bias themselves being completely biased, of course.I'm actually not bothered by the removal of neutral umpires from a sporting POV, I have enough faith in their integrity and DRS gives you the means to basically nullify biased umpiring as long as you're not careless with using it. I'm more worried about, from a sanity whilst using the internent perspective, the potential for media (and more likely social media) shitstorms if something happens that could be remotely interpreted as biased
Sorry, what relevance does that have to my comment?I would take 10 Dharmasenas over 1 Shakoor Rana
Bring back Darrell HairI would take 10 Dharmasenas over 1 Shakoor Rana
What relevance do most of your comments have to anything?Sorry, what relevance does that have to my comment?
Pretty sure he didn't play 2004 tour, he retired before that iircYeah from 2004 tour. Was a pretty stock standard offie, don't think he chucked it but maybe he did a bit but you just didn't notice next to Murali.
You do not recall correctly.Pretty sure he didn't play 2004 tour, he retired before that iirc
No one in NZ has ever had any confidence around the self control of Tim Southee and a bat.I also specify rabies because the only way Tim Southee would take the time to actually show a bit of caution with a bat is if it ****ing bit him first.
We'll agree to disagree on that. A batting average of 17, batting at 8 and 9 the majority of his career, is a disgrace for a guy of his ability. And it was the way he went about it as well.he's right tbh. he was always correct to focus on his bowling. amazing eye but doesn't like it up him and has probably never built an innings in his life at the senior levels. he'd need so much work to get up to proper #8 standard, and that would be time not spent on his bowling.
in that 2012-wc 2015 period he was insanely good. never got the plaudits because we're not cool and we were playing at midnight nz time half the time, and him peaking at like 25 years old is pretty frustrating. if he was still the same bowler he'd be on at least 350 wickets by now.