I'm always in favour of data editors because they never get them right. I don't like playing against unknown medium pacers from India who dominate just because they have an awesome domestic record. I seriously wonder if the database is tested out to see whether or not actual international players ever get a game.
Amen to that, Look at the starting lineup that ICC2008 puts in for the first test, I mean who the hell are half the players ?
Database editors seem very taboo to Chris, and that suprises me. All ICC's competitors and peers have editors (FM, CCoach, Cricket 07, OOTP, ITC etc etc etc) I don't see any major game failures as a result.
You could start games with a "clean" database or an edited one, and this would show in your team details and in the lobby when playing online.
You could set up points systems to have truly equal teams competing.
Say 450 points per team, 1 point for every batting point average to a maximum of 35 then 2 from 36 to 50 and 3 thereafter. Also 1 point for every bowling point average below 65 (2 points below 35 and 3 below 20 - in this case a minimum of 18 perhaps).
Name your players, give them your own BMP's and have really interesting "what if's ?"
Retention of team's stats and records would be great. Unless you break partership records, your super player and all his history just disapears forever once they retire - A whole mini-industry in cricket books would simply not exist if people weren't interested in the feats and fates of great historical cricketers. In all ICC games they just disapear forever. That really needs fixing.
6's - ICC seems to be back in the old sarawak cane days of heavy over pressed bats and massive outfields, but then I've mentioned this year after year to little effect.
I can't believe this one can be THAT difficult, and lets face it ICC is so obviously out of kilter I'm amazed this hasn't been fixed, perhaps Chris hoped Twenty20 would go away and take it's new generation of big hitters with it ..who knows ?
Scritty