interesting read indeed. thanks! the references to that belter - hardehar! - roebuck's articles being the only blemish.
just a quibble -- not sure that the ashes (the series, more appropriately) would have been lost if the right training, selection etc. (all mentioned in the very first para of the piece) had been catered to correctly.
just a quibble -- not sure that the ashes (the series, more appropriately) would have been lost if the right training, selection etc. (all mentioned in the very first para of the piece) had been catered to correctly.