• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

How many temporary bans...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
So, just to keep-up, we've now had...

Pnottath
Precambrian
susudear
martin88
antimatter (possibly)
GeraintIsMyZero (?)
Don Bradman
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
There was another account, donmesswidme, created in the Nayar thread which was banned and the account deleted.
 

duffer

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yeah that was incredible, about two minutes after Bradman was banned he pops up again. Swift work to get rid of that one though.

Over/under on when he'll be back? I say 2 days.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
So, just to keep-up, we've now had...

Pnottath
Precambrian
susudear
martin88
antimatter (possibly)
GeraintIsMyZero (?)
Don Bradman
There was one before susudear that he got banned for

I reckon the GIMZ one was him - that was actually funny though, so I wouldn't be too sure
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Has anyone here grasped the fact that talking about Trolls make them more likely to come back, as they're generally attention-seeking ****s.

Oh no, I've done it now:unsure:
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Has anyone here grasped the fact that talking about Trolls make them more likely to come back, as they're generally attention-seeking ****s.
That's not actually true, as Shane Warne and Precambrian's cases demonstrate. They've duplicated again and again whether people talk about them or ignore completely.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
he wasn't grapedo then?
No, no, not at all. grapedo was your general clueless idiot, marginally above bond21\frey standard - Precambrian wasn't, I don't think, actually a bad kid. Just a bit, well... too rough around the edges for CW, sadly.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
So we reckon:

Pnottath
Precambrian
susudear
nairbmacerp
martin88
antimatter (possibly)
GeraintIsMyZero (?)
Don Bradman
donmesswidme
 

Flem274*

123/5
No, no, not at all. grapedo was your general clueless idiot, marginally above bond21\frey standard - Precambrian wasn't, I don't think, actually a bad kid. Just a bit, well... too rough around the edges for CW, sadly.
Precam went mental after he changed from Pnottah to his classic Precambrian account.

I think we need to begin the CWSP (Cricketweb Secret Police) in order to knock on the doors of people we don't want back at 4am, take them to a secret location for interrogation and then sell them for medical experiments.
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Precam went mental after he changed from Pnottah to his classic Precambrian account.
He was mental as Pnottah as well. The posts I read of his after he changed to Precambrian were initially much better than those he made as Pnottah. Then he went downhill.
 

James

Cricket Web Owner
Can we please stop the abuse of Precambrian. Even though he's been banned, it doesn't mean posts such as the ones from Flem274* and NZTailender are acceptable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top