Mr Mxyzptlk
Request Your Custom Title Now!
But oh so true.Neil Pickup said:Poor excuse.
But oh so true.Neil Pickup said:Poor excuse.
It surprised me, but Athers autobiog mentions how they were keen to put him in, but got declined.Mr Mxyzptlk said:"He was seriously considered at the end of Atherton's stint, but the selectors overruled him."
This is the comment that mislead me...
unfortunately LE, I doubt this day will ever come.luckyeddie said:Keep trying, Rik.
One day you'll make sense
Look at the map.Craig said:And LE, what do you have against Nottinghamshire?
*Kicks Mr Ponting off the bandwagon*Mr. Ponting said:unfortunately LE, I doubt this day will ever come.
I disagree - Rik has made some extremely salient points in the past. Let's say that on this issue, he takes a lot of convincing.Mr. Ponting said:unfortunately LE, I doubt this day will ever come.
With both bowlers of that ilk injured, it's pretty hard to replace like for like.Rik said:One of Bickers and Kabir Ali will replace Harmison, which shows that the selectors are ignoring the need to replace a bowler with a "like for like" player
But the idea of the strike bowler (in the current England team context) is that he bowls quick and hurries batsmen.Mr Mxyzptlk said:But surely he has better control.
cost them did it? change didn't seem to make a difference.luckyeddie said:If Harmison doesn't play, they MUST play a spinner - just for the contrast.
England got into this nonsense of 4 samey medium pacers many years ago - and it cost them.
A medium pacer is like Hinds or Ealham. England are playing fast-medium/medium-fast bowlers.Bazza said:How about 5 samey medium pacers? It's different to 4 surely??