FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
Okay okay, that was kind of funny.Shane Warne said:When I say English players, I of course mean those who play for the England team.
I believe that about half of them are not actually English.
Okay okay, that was kind of funny.Shane Warne said:When I say English players, I of course mean those who play for the England team.
I believe that about half of them are not actually English.
Touche.Shane Warne said:When I say English players, I of course mean those who play for the England team.
I believe that about half of them are not actually English.
And England would give their left testicle for him to have played for them, whereas England happily take the Australian rejects with open arms.simmy said:And Andrew Symonds is I suppose? Born and bred in BIRMINGHAM!
The ODIs are totally irrelevant.shankar said:He was the only guy in the team to get any runs in the ODI series.
(He got 2 centuries, average of 47.0).If you're talking abt. tests, batsmen of both sides struggled on those sub-standard pitches.There were only 3 fifties in the whole series.The highest score in the 2nd test was 39.So he cant be judged on the basis of that series.
That's only fair, after all.Shane Warne said:And England would give their left testicle for him to have played for them, whereas England happily take the Australian rejects with open arms.
Hand picking their sterling-seeking players from a good three countries and get hammered by a country of less than a third their population?Shane Warne said:When I say English players, I of course mean those who play for the England team.
I believe that about half of them are not actually English.
While doing the utmost to hate everything South African other than that which has defected here.twctopcat said:It's all about making the england team as south african as possible, they're made of tougher stuff. Get prior in there now!!!
And our dregs have gone on to completely dominate you, I see England have adopted a different approach now. By importing the dregs from other countries you hope to be able to compete against Australia again.luckyeddie said:That's only fair, after all.
We started you off with the dregs of our society, now we've got a cricket team comprising the dregs of everyone else's.
Oh but of course. Anyone who doesn't defect is so inexplicably stupid they should be shot at rorkes's drift at dawn.Richard said:While doing the utmost to hate everything South African other than that which has defected here.
I love your patriotism scally, it oozes out of your every pore.Scallywag said:And our dregs have gone on to completely dominate you, I see England have adopted a different approach now. By importing the dregs from other countries you hope to be able to compete against Australia again.
Not a chance mate englishmen are just to physically weak to take on Aussies.
Ah, thanks for explaining that - every Englishman who hates South African cricket in every way is now justified (!)twctopcat said:Oh but of course. Anyone who doesn't defect is so inexplicably stupid they should be shot at rorkes's drift at dawn.
Langeveldt said:Hand picking their sterling-seeking players from a good three countries and get hammered by a country of less than a third their population?
Strauss sounds about as English as a plate of chicken foo-yong... When did he move?marc71178 said:England players in First Test: 11
English players: 10