If you want to call it defensive, sure. I do not have formal training in linguisitics, archeology or genetics, but have reasonably convinced myself that the invasion theory is at best, a highly exaggerated version of long term migration and assimilation patterns (as Shankar called it, Aryan Migration) or at worst , pure bunk. Would take far more than an anonymous poster on an internet forum or a few URLs to cause me to change it.Clear case of prejudice here
Why don't you go out and say it instead of insinuating.
Anyways.....why do you have to take such a lot of offense to what I said??? I just stated that the argument on the issue is not over & there is sufficient evidence to back the original theory as well.
Boy are you being defensive!!
In the meanwhile, I just do not want to go further because it gets into some things I dont want to go in (and that this forum for sure should not go in - regretting even my one post), like:
- north Indians vs south Indians
- greater bharat vs leftists
- how Pakistan is inheritor of IVC
- a superior aryan race and how a lot of culture & learning in the world came from that race.
- how casteism is actually racism
