Langeveldt
Soutie
Allan Mullallysteds said:Who's the batsman?
Allan Mullallysteds said:Who's the batsman?
Dravid wasn't cleaning it!Richard said:They got done for, effectively, cleaning the seam (without the Umpires' supervision),
The seam had a nasty cough!marc71178 said:Dravid wasn't cleaning it!
You don't state an opinion like an accusation.Swervy said:why..he is only stating an opinion..which some might say is grounded in the truth
steds said:Who's the batsman?
No, he wasn't, he was keeping his hands dry.luckyeddie said:And Atherton was conducting a scientific study to determine how high he could balance a conical pile of soil on a ball.
This was in order to determine the dampness of the soil (he had just planted some runner beans and was concerned that he might have over-watered them, so he brought a sample of earth with him from his garden to 'work' that day).
How long is those two Beamers at Symonds going to be held against Waqar for?Majin said:I 'spose it doesn't matter bowling filthy full tosses if you tamper with the ball. :{
nothin wrong with a full toss every now and then, plus the bowlers more likely to get hit for a boundary so its always good to see those stumps flying from one.Majin said:I 'spose it doesn't matter bowling filthy full tosses if you tamper with the ball. :{
Why do you?Richard said:Well, I hate to see him doing well in ODIs, yes
Because he was crap for about six years!marc71178 said:Why do you?
I've freely acknowledged that his shot-selection is near enough unrecognisable, just like Flintoff's has become - but nonetheless, because he's helped Australia, I don't like it!Richard said:his (Symonds') massive improvement (25 or something to 47 or something)