steds
Hall of Fame Member
There's the answer. They should try standing between them.TT Boy said:To be fair too Fabien, France were still in the mire when Coupet was behind the sticks.
There's the answer. They should try standing between them.TT Boy said:To be fair too Fabien, France were still in the mire when Coupet was behind the sticks.
Yes. If Switzerland beat Togo tonight, France are still sure of qualifying if they themselves beat Togo by 2 goals or more.TT Boy said:Well at least France’s qualification is still seemingly in their own hands. The sole objective against Togo will be goals, if the French can score a hatful which considering the strife Togo are in (and even with the discord in French camp). It is not too hard to foresee them progressing.
steds said:There's the answer. They should try standing between them.
If I did I'd have a lot more than 6000odd posts. As I've said before if he'd stayed as (wide) midfielder he'd have been a good international player, but he just doesn't have the bottle or nerve against top sides, clutch situations and so forth. The chance he passed almost straight at the keeper late on against South Korea is typical of what happens when there's a lot riding on it - if that chance was at 2 or 3 nil he'd have likely scored. I don't particularly like Owen but when he is at his best he takes the odd chance he gets (he's also a pretty good header of the ball actually), all the best teams have had someone like this (only better obviously) - you get to a point with these players where you just don't expect them to miss when they get a good chance, look at the business end of World Cups over the years and you'll not see many good chances, but they're nearly always taken - that's what relegates chief to just being a solid international player.FaaipDeOiad said:There's nothing wrong with parts of Scaly's argument... Henry has underachieved at international level when compared to his club performances. However, his record in major tournaments is pretty good, especially when you consider that his side have only scored one World Cup goal since 1998, and he scored it. His club performances are obviously top notch and have been for some time, and his record in internationals isn't really that bad, it's just average rather than sensational.
The thing that makes Scaly's argument absurd is how ridiculously over the top he goes with it. Giving him a derogatory nickname and carrying on every time he misses a chance as if he's the worst striker on earth is idiotic, and funnily enough it's the same thing he does with Sven. I wonder why that could be...
Yep, just as well for France that it goes to goal difference now (firstly) instead of results between teams - a convenient high scoring draw (2-2 or better) would have put France out regardless as I think happened to Italy.GeraintIsMyHero said:If the other game's a draw, and France win by 2, France and Switzerland go through
No, a win by 2 goals would be enough. As would the Swiss beating Korea.aussie said:Francw will need to win & also hope Korea beat the swiss to be assured of qualifying..
He did actually provide some spark when he came on.sledger said:condolences to him for that, cant be nice living with that sort of contstand reminder, but he is another one who has looked distinctly unimpressive.
Play to the whistle. Second thing all kids are taught after "if in doubt, put it out".FaaipDeOiad said:Mixed feelings about South Korea's misfortune. They could have got a draw, and for mine the second goal shouldn't have stood. Technically the referee made the correct decision, but the linesman put up his flag and the Korean defenders stopped, expecting a free kick. Had the flag not gone up and they kept coming after Frei, he might not have been able to score.
Anyway, I don't like them much, and they got plenty of favours from the referees last time anyway, so I won't shed a tear.
Switzerland finishing on top means we have the worst second round match by far between them and Ukraine, with the winner facing Italy or Australia. Nice draw for us, if we get through.