Dead right - especially as WI only had 2 wickets down when he started that spell. I thought was a really good piece of bowling, tbh. Some people just won't accept it, but he's done some good things in his last 4 odi's.marc71178 said:They did, but got to give Saj some credit for those 3 overs at the death - 7, 6, 4 and a wicket isn't bad.
Change so quickly?pasag said:0/50 after 7 overs. Not bad. Might have a game on our hands.
Operative word there being might, England in ODI's seem to yo-yo from dismal to abysmalpasag said:0/50 after 7 overs. Not bad. Might have a game on our hands.
It's England tbh.Dravid said:Change so quickly?
They are 62-0 after 8.4 tbhpasag said:It's England tbh.
Well, it might do, but we have reached 80 for 0 before, and much good it did us.Dravid said:Gayle dropped Strauss..will cost West Indies the match. 77-0 after 10
Who's Biffer - Tres? If so, I was wondering the same thing. Having a RH/LH combo at the top of the order is no bad thing, and Tres hasn't exactly been full of runs opening in this form of the game.PY said:Another solid start from these two, definitely looking like the start of a decent partnership at the top.
Biffer at 3 if he returns? That'd add a new angle to things.
Reads like a pretty dumb shot on cricinfo, and we really needed him to go on with it.Dravid said:And hes bowled the next ball 82-1