Statsguru.Could someone tell me where I can find Stuart Broad's bowling analysis for (say) his last 10 overs in competitive T20? He seems to be the opposition's secret weapon at the moment - all very well complaining about the umpiring decisions; NZ were 6 behind on DL before he stepped up to bowl - 6 balls later they were 9 ahead! He even makes Jade Dernbach look economical. I would love to know just how many runs he has conceded recently - because he was carted all over the park in the West Indies as well.
Looks like he either does very well or very bad..
Could someone tell me where I can find Stuart Broad's bowling analysis for (say) his last 10 overs in competitive T20? He seems to be the opposition's secret weapon at the moment - all very well complaining about the umpiring decisions; NZ were 6 behind on DL before he stepped up to bowl - 6 balls later they were 9 ahead! He even makes Jade Dernbach look economical. I would love to know just how many runs he has conceded recently - because he was carted all over the park in the West Indies as well.
Yeah, I agree.Why would anyone want to retain Munro? If I had a say in the matter he wouldn't have even been in the squad, take his 70 something not out v Bangladesh and he averages about 10 and that would be about right. Neesham has to come in.
Deserves to be there on what basis? Southee has been bowling pies so we need a 6th bowler plus a batsman who doesn't try to be cute against quality bowlers.nah Munro deserves to be there.
it's Neesham vs Southee or Anderson, IMO. I'd keep the same team.
If Southee's bowling pies then replace Southee. You don't bring another bowler into the side at the expense of your number 5 batsman.Deserves to be there on what basis? Southee has been bowling pies so we need a 6th bowler plus a batsman who doesn't try to be cute against quality bowlers.
If you genuinely believe that Neesham is a better batsman than Munro, then fine, call for his replacement. But you don't replace a batsman with an all-rounder because you want bowling coverage for a poorly performing Southee. If Southee is a problem, replace Southee.Neesham is an alrounder who averages about 10 more than Munro with the bat domestically.
We don't have a replacement seam bowler apart from Boult and they won't risk him in a do or die match. I also like the idea of Anderson batting at 5 in this format.If you genuinely believe that Neesham is a better batsman than Munro, then fine, call for his replacement. But you don't replace a batsman with an all-rounder because you want bowling coverage for a poorly performing Southee. If Southee is a problem, replace Southee.
Personally, I wouldn't make any changes.