Greatest teams of all time.

[AndrewB]

We do also have the 1946/47 series which did include Bradman of course. The general focus seems to be how weak England were in that series, but that's slightly unfair to the Australian side.

They also beat India in 1947-8.

 

[kyear2]

Different issue completely. The Australian team post War till '52 was as dominant as any ever, with or without Don.

I've seen arguments surrounding how weakened England was from the war, but that aside, no one referenced that side, becuse again, no Bradman. So it lacked the luster of the other sides without the great man, all I meant.

 

[capt_Luffy]

I've seen arguments surrounding how weakened England was from the war, but that aside, no one referenced that side, becuse again, no Bradman. So it lacked the luster of the other sides without the great man, all I meant.

I mean, do I even need to elaborate the difference just he name in the team sheet brings? Of course everyone will fawn over the team having him given an option between two otherwise similar ones. But again, I just pointed out that Australia really was very dominant in that 7 year stretch and Don actually played a few more matches as well, like the India series.