fredfertang
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I'm not best pleased with him at presentSurprised you not said Glenn Chapple.
I'm not best pleased with him at presentSurprised you not said Glenn Chapple.
Depends what sort of abuse you want - you’ll get a bit of gentle mockery for that - if you’re after being described as moronic you’ll need to come up with something much more controversialIs this one of those moments I say Pete Trego and Sam Northeast and get showered with abuse?
Like ''I'm going to the shops for a pint of milk''?Depends what sort of abuse you want - you’ll get a bit of gentle mockery for that - if you’re after being described as moronic you’ll need to come up with something much more controversial
Isn't that usually my job?Surprised you not said Glenn Chapple.
Definitely. Poor guy had to deal with a lot of prejudice though.Palwankar Baloo is one to consider.
He, along with Amol Muzumdar, were so unlucky not to sneak in a Test for their country during the 90's. Had India played more Tests back then I have a feeling they would have gotten the break they both deserved.Utpal Chatterjee
Good stuff.Perhaps these two teams could hold their own against many an actual Test team:
Jamie Siddons
John Langridge
David Hussey
Mahadevan Sathasivam
Bhausaheb Nimbalkar
Clive Rice*
Frank Tarrant
Darren Berry+
Bart King
Vincent Van Der Bijl
Rajinder Goel
Jamie Cox*
Sam Trimble
Brian Davison
Ken McEwan
Shantanu Sugwekar
Alan Kourie
Franklyn Stephenson
Garth Le Roux
Henry Martyn+
Charles Kortwright
Don Shepherd
Probably not close at all considering how prevalent racism was back in the 30's.I often wonder how close Gilbert came to being selected during Bodyline when we lacked pace bowlers of note
Gilbert had an ordinary season. Only really started playing to qualify for the 4th test iirc. Underwhelming for Qld against the MCC immediately before hand so the selectors lost whatever interest they may have had. Gilbert was no good outside of Brisbane anyway. If Australia were to play him they'd have to pick an additional bowler to cover for his lack of stamina. That would have been at the cost of a batsman in a series where Australia struggled for runs. Australia would have been better off pairing up Laurie Nash and Harry Alexander with Tim Wall for at least some of the matches in that series. Maybe at Sydney and Adelaide and relied on their strong spin attack at other venues. You'd still back England but the 3 mentioned were swift enough to maybe make England compromise on their tactics if they were subjected to them. Then again for that to happen the selectors needed to drop Woodfull and appoint Richardson captain.I often wonder how close Gilbert came to being selected during Bodyline when we lacked pace bowlers of note
I think the selectorial bias against Nash was more likely than against Gilbert. Australia did have the pace bowlers to retaliate. They had a captain in Richardson who would have too. He would have been able to handle Nash. Remember the selectors put aside their misgivings when the following series in Aus was all square going into the 5th. As Nash said they knew who to come for when everything was on the line. Nash reckoned he'd only need 3 overs at Hammond to sort out bodyline.From what I've read Nash had a real problem with behavioural issues. He was a bit rough around the edges, definitely not suited to cricket in the 30's, which was very much still a game of Empire.
There were concerns over his action also. Whether that concern was tied to racism is possible.Probably not close at all considering how prevalent racism was back in the 30's.