Me too, but I haven't been around that longandyc said:From what I've seen in my life, Langer and Hayden at their best (I'd say 2001 or so) were simply awesome.
haven't seen edrich play...by the time i started watching cricket, it was boycott and tavare, boycott and gooch etc etc.....when you look at stats, edrich's stats certainly look quite impressive, but didn't he bat 1st down and 2nd down as well, i mean he seems to have been more of a top-order batsman than a pure opener....luckyeddie said:My exact same choices, although I have a soft spot for Boycott and Edrich too.
Agreed, at that stage I believe they had the best average of an opening pair ever, did they not ??andyc said:From what I've seen in my life, Langer and Hayden at their best (I'd say 2001 or so) were simply awesome.
Second best, after Hobbs and Sutcliffe. Really, Hobbs and Sutcliffe are comparable to Bradman as an opening pair. Their average together is 87 or so, and it unlikely to ever be surpassed. Everyone else is fighting for second place.Demolition Man said:Agreed, at that stage I believe they had the best average of an opening pair ever, did they not ??
was it a sleepover ?cricket player said:Saeed anwar @ Amir Sohail
Because they've never done it against the best attacks.Pothas said:why not?
Yep. Consider these stats, though:Barney Rubble said:As far as opening pairs in the past decade or so go, and if you discount Hayden and Langer as they were so far ahead of everyone else, Trescothick and
Vaughan were pretty damn good for a while.
MP Vaughan & ME Trescothick (Eng) 28 52 3 2386 48.69 5 15
AJ Strauss & ME Trescothick (Eng) 17 32 1 1693 52.91 6 6
Wow - didn't know the current boys were quite that successful. Exciting times for English cricket indeed.Samuel_Vimes said:Yep. Consider these stats, though:
Certainly suggests England don't need to worry about the opening position any time soon.Code:MP Vaughan & ME Trescothick (Eng) 28 52 3 2386 48.69 5 15 AJ Strauss & ME Trescothick (Eng) 17 32 1 1693 52.91 6 6