Well no it wouldn't as KP going into his mode had nothing to do with England getting a 6-run first innings lead. We'd scored 370+, it was mid-September and bleak. If they wanted to put us under and win by an innings then they needed to bat more positively.Nah ****s, gutsing it out and scoring a tough hundred when you've been massively out of form and been exposed all series takes a lot of mental strength. Taking the light was stupid but Langer and Hayden were setting Australia up for a 'bat once and strangle England with pressure on day 5' effort. Which would have worked had KP not gone into God mode.
Well yeah, the weather obviously put paid to that, and like I said, Hayden and Langer taking the light on day 2 when Langer at least was smashing the bowling around was a bit strange to say the least. Weather more than anything else put paid to Australia's chances of winning - they batted in atrocious conditions on day 4 and collapsed. Had the weather held, Hayden and Langer had put Australia in an excellent position.Well no it wouldn't as KP going into his mode had nothing to do with England getting a 6-run first innings lead. We'd scored 370+, it was mid-September and bleak. If they wanted to put us under and win by an innings then they needed to bat more positively.
Hayden played for himself. Of course runs are better than no runs but his efforts didn't show mental strength at all IMO, you never felt the game was getting away from us like you often do when facing a 150+ opening stand
Just ftr Freddie would have bowled us to victory if we has collapsed on day 5
It was mid-September and Australia had to win. I'm all for playing your game and not declaring on forecasts etc but at the same time you have to play the situation. Hayden didn't, IMO.Well yeah, the weather obviously put paid to that, and like I said, Hayden and Langer taking the light on day 2 when Langer at least was smashing the bowling around was a bit strange to say the least. Weather more than anything else put paid to Australia's chances of winning - they batted in atrocious conditions on day 4 and collapsed. Had the weather held, Hayden and Langer had put Australia in an excellent position.
At stumps on Day 2, with Australia still 260-odd behind, Hayden was 33* from 32 overs. Langer was 75*.It was mid-September and Australia had to win. I'm all for playing your game and not declaring on forecasts etc but at the same time you have to play the situation. Hayden didn't, IMO.
For a batsman who could put the ball into the stratosphere when in form, Hayden could be tedious to watch when playing inside one of his bubbles. Despite their gap in 6-hitting and career strike rates, Langer was actually more pleasing on the eye for much of the time.At stumps on Day 2, with Australia still 260-odd behind, Hayden was 33* from 32 overs. Langer was 75*.