If you wanted a team to play for 4 years and could pick any 4-year period of a player, I'd have Botham (not as captain) and Waqar before Bradman or even Sobers.And yea, that performance by Botham has to be up there with the best.
Botham, much like Waqar, had a peak that was virtually unmatched by anyone in the history of the game. Sometimes, I perhaps don't give enough credit to Botham due to his lack of longevity, but if we're taking peaks, he'd be the first name down on my all time XI after Bradman.
Really doubt that he would, you can see his round the wicket problem from space.And of course my wicketkeeper-batsman would be Gilchrist of '99/00-'03, who averaged 59 (though whether he'd do that against The Martian All-Time XI is another matter).
I dunno, didn't stop him when he blasted that 100 at Perth.Really doubt that he would, you can see his round the wicket problem from space.
(Sorry)
Sorry about that, it was a lame attempt at a joke, I'm not legitimately criticising his technique.I dunno, didn't stop him when he blasted that 100 at Perth.
Never heard of this but yes a terrific performance when you consider the opposition. One of the greatest examples of a captain leading from the front.Considering the quality of opposition, this performance by Mushtaq Mohammad, if not the greatest all-round effort, has to at least be the most underrated.
Cricinfo - 4th Test: West Indies v Pakistan at Port of Spain, Apr 1-6, 1977
Oh the ideologies...If you wanted a team to play for 4 years and could pick any 4-year period of a player, I'd have Botham (not as captain) and Waqar before Bradman or even Sobers.
Bowlers win matches, and (even regardless of Botham's power with the bat) his bowling during his lengthy peak was precious little behind Waqar's in his own equal-length one. If you had him of '77-'81 (not as captain) with new ball and Waqar of '90/91-'94/95 with old you'd have the best two bowlers over a four-year period the game has ever seen.
Then I'd have Bradman, Headley, Sobers and the rest of the batting. And of course my wicketkeeper-batsman would be Gilchrist of '99/00-'03, who averaged 59 (though whether he'd do that against The Martian All-Time XI is another matter).
Every performance he does is an individual performance, cricket is a TEAM sport, no one man can make a team great and it doesnt matter how great the individual is.
say whatOh the ideologies...
One man can be the difference between a poor team and an average team, an average team and a good team, or a good team and a great team. yes, this is a team sport but the individuals make up the team, in other team sports a team of well in-tune good playrs can be a very good team, in cricket without that someone special you will not reach the top level. You need a bowler who is going to turn in devastating spells, batsmen who score centuries to change a game, etcEvery performance he does is an individual performance, cricket is a TEAM sport, no one man can make a team great and it doesnt matter how great the individual is.
At any point in a game of cricket, it's one vs one. Cricket may be a team sport but it's played by individuals.Every performance he does is an individual performance, cricket is a TEAM sport, no one man can make a team great and it doesnt matter how great the individual is.
Indeed that performance really slipped under the radar, phenomenal effort, especially as the opposition don't get much stronger than that, he was in their back yard too.Never heard of this but yes a terrific performance when you consider the opposition. One of the greatest examples of a captain leading from the front.