Laker≈Grimmett>Kumble≥Ashwin imo.Laker and Grum > Ashwin and Kumble
Start a new thread for this.Kumble and Ashwin is interesting
Lyon is Great at home, Benaud failed in EnglandLyon??
Benaud was much better
I blame @sayon basak and his obsession with pestering @capt_Luffy for all time lists.Start a new thread for this.
The topic here is English spinners
Disagree.I blame @sayon basak and his obsession with pestering @capt_Luffy for all time lists.
OT — anyway, Laker, monster on wet pitches, proven on flat pitches ss well
lol what.Everything's fine by me, but yeah, Laker>Ashwin literally makes no sense to me. Every criticism of Ashwin is 3x applicable on Laker and every strength of Laker is 3x magnified on Ashwin.
Like Lyon in Pakistan?Lyon is Great at home, Benaud failed in England
England=/= PakistanLike Lyon in Pakistan?
Any opinion on the topic?Start a new thread for this.
The topic here is English spinners
averages 31 in West Indies, which is pretty decent given the pitches and the batting.Disagree.
actual ban worthy stance if yes.@capt_Luffy you rate Lyon over Underwood???
It's alright. But pitches weren't necessarily unresponsive to spin. In first series Ramadhin topped wickets/average and so did Wilf Ferguson in the 2nd.averages 31 in West Indies, which is pretty decent given the pitches and the batting.
that's why I rate windies spinners, they made something out of the flat roads they were served at home.It's alright. But pitches weren't necessarily unresponsive to spin. In first series Ramadhin topped wickets/average and so did Wilf Ferguson in the 2nd.
Not necessarily always. Laker yes, but others not so much. And like, Ramadhin is fine but the 2nd was literally Wilf Ferguson. Not to mention after the first WI tour of his, both his captain (Hutton) and selectors lost confidence on him performing away.that's why I rate windies spinners, they made something out of the flat roads they were served at home.