• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Greatest cricketer post 1990

Select your greatest post 1990 cricketer


  • Total voters
    117

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Considering that he is universally acknowledged as a genius, and was recently named to Cricinfo's All time World XI by a panel of former international captains, who presumably know what they are talking about, I am curious why Wasim Akram has not received a single vote. I would rate him shoulder to shoulder, or maybe just behind Curtly Ambrose as the greatest fast bowler of the last 20 years, and certainly the most brilliant.

Just looking at the result of this poll, I am fairly certain that if you asked the players, who are invariably the best judges, this exact question, the result would almost be the complete opposite. I think that Akram would probably feature in the top 3 or 4, and there is no way in the world that Jaques Kallis would receive the most votes.
Akram is my favorite bowler and I would actually consider him the bowler of the 90s. Overall, though, I do feel he underachieved for so talented a bowler and should have ended with a much higher bag of wickets. His record is impressive but not quite to the level of Ambrose and McGrath, whom I feel maximized their talents well.
 

Fusion

Global Moderator
Considering that he is universally acknowledged as a genius, and was recently named to Cricinfo's All time World XI by a panel of former international captains, who presumably know what they are talking about, I am curious why Wasim Akram has not received a single vote. I would rate him shoulder to shoulder, or maybe just behind Curtly Ambrose as the greatest fast bowler of the last 20 years, and certainly the most brilliant.

Just looking at the result of this poll, I am fairly certain that if you asked the players, who are invariably the best judges, this exact question, the result would almost be the complete opposite. I think that Akram would probably feature in the top 3 or 4, and there is no way in the world that Jaques Kallis would receive the most votes.
As pointed out by Marc, you can only vote for one person. I have great admiration for Wasim and think him to be one of the greatest bowlers of all-time. I also think he’s a bit under-rated on CW from what I’ve observed. Having said all that, I still think Tendulkar achieved more than Wasim in the specified time frame so I voted for him. If the poll was about the “top 5 cricketers post 1990”, I would bet you’d see Wasim get a hefty amount of votes.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Tough call to pick between Kallis and Tendy for mine. In the end I decided you gain a tiny bit more with Kallis's bowling than you lose with his batting (compared to Tendulkar)
 

Contra

Cricketer Of The Year
Another thing with Wasim Akram is that he played a fair bit of his Cricket before 1990 as well. So his stats post 1990 won't look as impressive as some of the other guys who played pretty much all there Cricket post 1990.

Anyway voted for Tendulkar. If it was greatest test cricketer post 1990 then I probably would have picked someone else but his ODI record is just so so good over 20 years which tips it for me, only just though.
 
Last edited:

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
I thought if it is worth anything ,should throw it in Graeme Pollock just saying on ten cricket that left upto him Sachin is the best batsmen since the Don.
 

Migara

International Coach
If somebody asked whose the player you want in your XI out of the above that will change the answers I think. Personally my first rate would be Kallis, then Murali and then McGrath. I coudn't figure out why Tendulkar gets such high number of votes who only excelled in one department of the game, not more than or even touch less than Murali and McGrath who excelled in their own departments.
 
Last edited:

smash84

The Tiger King
all of them are wonderful cricketers. actually, even rahul dravid, inzamam and sehwag deserve to be listed there.

among these giants, statistically, muralitharan and kallis achieved some milestones that will remain untouched, probably, forever. therefore it is very easy, and justifiable, to name one of them as the best cricketer of the era.

in terms of style and panache, warne and lara elevated their respective arts to a different plane that even other greats could reach only once or twice in their careers, if they are lucky. because of this box office quality, shane and brian are probably the strongest candidates in my opinion.

tendulkar remains a model of cricketing perfection and continues to inspire cricket enthusiasts with his longevity and consistency. he will probably win the poll if the entire world were to be involved in voting.

ambrose, mcgrath and akram could walk into any all time xi with ease. so could ponting and waqar. they won matches on their own again and again all over the globe.

but i choose adam gilchrist because he expressed himself on the cricket field with a force that was never before seen from a no.7 batsman. he continued for a good part of his long and uninterrupted career (96 tests on the trot from debut till retirement!) to win matches for his country with several late order gems that turned games around. he demoralised the opposition with his power hitting and helped his team reach its targets faster. he also chipped in when the stakes were down and rescued australia on several occasions with responsible batting.

gilly never allowed anything - opposion, match condition or his own form - to bog him down. pace or spin didnt make any difference. he came out with an intent to hit out and more often than not he did precisely that. he played the game at rocket pace but with pin point precision. there was a method to his madness that brought him hundreds against all the countries he played against.

of course, he was one of the greatest wicket keepers of all time. even if technically healy (and knott) was a better bet behind the stumps, gilly never let warne or mcgill down. standing up to their vicious leg spinners, he took edges that came his way and effected brilliant stumpings when the oppotunity presented itself. similarly standing back for mcgrath, lee and gillespie he pouched more catches than anybody before him had done.

for all round quality and non stop entertainment and certain victory for his side, every captain would love to have gilly in the team. he is definitely the third cricketer i would choose in my team (after bradman and sobers) for there was no one like him before he wore that baggy green and there will not be another one in my lifetime.
Top notch post.

Although the cricketer of the post 90 era for me would be Shane Warne. From all those that I have seen that man had a presence on the field second only to Imran Khan and Viv Richards. The mind games that he would play with the batsman and the umpires was a real treat to watch. Very animated, very energetic and a real fighter to the last ball of the game. He had that never say die spirit that you would equate with Australianism and was one of the finest big match players of all time.
 

angad

U19 12th Man
32000 International Cricket runs (96 Tons) + 200 Wickets

vs

22500 International Cricket runs (55 Tons) + 520 wickets

How much 10k extra international runs @ better strike rate or 300 extra international wickets @ better strike rate/average makes differance?

Anyway voted for Tendulkar, considering burden of captaincy, expectation of billions, meaningful international runs early in his career with no support from other players and better consistency against Australia/England/Sri Lanka compared to Kallis.
 
Last edited:

smash84

The Tiger King
32000 International Cricket runs (96 Tons) + 200 Wickets

vs

22500 International Cricket runs (55 Tons) + 520 wickets

How much 10k extra international runs @ better strike rate or 300 extra international wickets @ better strike rate/average makes differance?

Anyway voted for Tendulkar, considering burden of captaincy, expectation of billions, meaningful international runs early in his career with no support from other players and good consistency against Australia.
burden of captaincy????
 

ankitj

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Considering the expectation of a billion, we should equate a Ponting 100 with Tendulkar's 2 runs :ph34r:
 

archie mac

International Coach
Not sure my vote should count as I only took into acccount Test cricket as ODI make me sleepy 8-)


STR for me, although the record of Kallis in Test cricket may last longer then even STRs records in Test cricket

McGrath was quality but I doubt he was clearly the best of his time (as a bowler as opposed to fast bowler):)
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
As a total cricketer, has to be Kallis really.

For a specialist in anything:

Ooh Ahh....

Glenn McGrath
 

Debris

International 12th Man
Seeing as how this is greatest cricketer and not best cricketer, I think this is Warne by a distance. His influence on the game goes well beyond his performances on the field, much more so than anyone else on the list.

There is a bit of "what have you done for me lately" about the poll results. The old guys didn't really stand a chance..:laugh:
 
Last edited:

smash84

The Tiger King
Seeing as how this is greatest cricketer and not best cricketer, I think this is Warne by a distance. His influence on the game goes well beyond his performances on the field, much more so than anyone else on the list.
Agreed. I just said the same thing.
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
Seeing as how this is greatest cricketer and not best cricketer, I think this is Warne by a distance. His influence on the game goes well beyond his performances on the field, much more so than anyone else on the list.

There is a bit of "what have you done for me lately" about the poll results. The old guys didn't really stand a chance..:laugh:
I don't get this statement i don't see how his cricketing influence was more then say a Shaun Pollock its not like there are great leg spinners cropping up from every other cricketing country sure he had an interesting life off the field but he was not the first to have one Imran before him and even Keith Miller who was well before him had been on this path and his main stream appeal was also pretty much matched by a lot of his contemporaries Sachin,Flintoof,Lara and Shoaib to name a few.I have no issues in you calling him the greatest ever as he was that damn good but the argument you put forward is a bit flawed imo:)
 

Top