Do we seriously expect one catch out of thousands over 129 years of test cricket to be singled out as the best?
Come on guys lets have some sense of perspective and some respect for credibility. We already have the ridiculous tag of the 'ball of the century'.
How about the 'Greatest shot ever"? One can understand the fascination with the highest, tallest, fattest, fastest, slowest etc etc but when we come to subjective things like we need to restrict the debate to more sober and reasonable titles to fantastic athletic feats or sporting achevements that are otherwise not measurable.
There is no indignity in being classified one of the greatest ever for any batsman, bowler, fielder or catch for that matter.