Ikki
Hall of Fame Member
You said Imran has good batting and Miller has good bowling. The qualitative word being "good' and identical in both cases.how did you come to that conclusion ikki? when did i say that?
okay let me start again if you need help
Imran's bowling A
Imran's batting B
Miller's bowling C
Miller's batting D
1) A>> (C=D) >B --------------------> so miller is a more well rounded all-rounder than imran
2) (A - C) >> (D - B) ---=------------> so imran is more useful as the fourth bowler in an all time XI
I agree with the above: Miller is more well-rounded and Imran would be a better fourth bowler. However, Miller would be a better fourth bowler and good bat.