No but it can be settled by facts...Mr. Ponting said:this cannot be settled by stats, cloete. it is very opinionised.
Facts and Reality have an odd habbit of overhauling OpinionMr. Ponting said:you're thinking of facts. that includes opinion
See 'Harmison'Rik said:Facts and Reality have an odd habbit of overhauling Opinion
Or "Brett Lee"luckyeddie said:See 'Harmison'
if you are implying what i think you are, you are mistaken. brett lee has been much on the improve, and he concentrates more on his line and lengthRik said:Or "Brett Lee"
That is true but dont try telling Rick that he wont belve it untill he see's it himself witch is fair enough I suppose.Mr. Ponting said:if you are implying what i think you are, you are mistaken. brett lee has been much on the improve, and he concentrates more on his line and length
I'm not mistaken, he's stupidly over-rated in Tests.Mr. Ponting said:if you are implying what i think you are, you are mistaken. brett lee has been much on the improve, and he concentrates more on his line and length
Right, here we go again:Eclipse said:That is true but dont try telling Rick that he wont belve it untill he see's it himself witch is fair enough I suppose.
I though he bowled very well in the West Indies.
Wether Rik Likes it or not Lee is still a good bowler and should not be mentioned in the same sentance as Harmison they bowl compleatly diffrently.
few do.Mr. Ponting said:thanks for that, eclispe. and no, i won't bother with Rik
What's your problem I am not trying to argue with you ?? You know my views and I know yours I respect your views and for the most part agree with them.Rik said:Right, here we go again:
1. It's RIK not Rick
2. Weather you like it or not you cannot fake a Test average of just under 30. As Age_Master once said "Australia can afford to carry him"
3. I wouldn't wish anyone to be compared to Harmison, not even Brett Lee
4. Lee has a Test average of over 40 against England, from about 7 Tests. Is that what I'm supposed to be impressed with?
5. When I talk to Andre he can't have enough things to say about how over-rated he is.
6. Just because you bowl fast doesn't make you a good bowler :P
It's an old arguement commonly replied to by Age or Eclipse with "Whatever you say he's a good bowler", yes he can bowl a yorker in ODIs, but Test cricket is the real deal! On that arguement you will never win.
Considering you've only been posting for a week, a judgement such as that is as shallow as it is ill-informed.Mr. Ponting said:but what did you expect. it's Rik
Ok sorryEclipse said:What's your problem I am not trying to argue with you ?? You know my views and I know yours I respect your views and for the most part agree with them.
Now Lee had been VERY Ordanary in Test cricket up untill the Sydney test match for quite some time I DONT DISAGREE WITH THAT so stop mentioning the fact he has avraged around 40 in that 18 month period & his poor record against England I dont need any confermation.
I did say he bowled well In the West Indies in test cricket prehaps the best since his operation.
I also said you wont make any judgemnets on Lee untill you see him do well yourself and IMO that is perfectly acceptable.
What did I say that upset you so much??