The Baconator
International Vice-Captain
Don't have a problem with either, and can see why people would have a problem with the Murali far more than this one.
FWIW i think Gilchrist deliberately missed the stumps in that situation, then told KP he'd hit them if they did it again.Slow Love™ said:Haha, yeah, nice try but no cigar, Neil. I didn't think NZ were beyond the pale in executing the runout against Murali (I forgot to vote, but my position should be obvious from my post), but the situations aren't really equivalent.
I would have thought a better example was the one I gave in the original Murali thread from the other day's Ashes play - where Gilchrist rolled the ball at the stumps after KP left the crease to talk to his partner while the ball was still live. He (Gilchrist) missed, but you'd have to assume that given he tried, he certainly would have appealed for the run-out.
Dasa said:Pretty poor thread from such a member IMO. Just ****-stirring.
The situations aren't really comparable either - one was going to congratulate a team-mate on a century and (incorrectly) assumed the ball wasn't alive, while this was when the player was waiting for a decision and the ball was clearly in play. Very different situations.
Anyway, I have the same view I had of the Murali run-out. I can see why the Aussies did it and I can understand international players wanting to get wickets any way they can, but it's not something I would do.
marc71178 said:Someone's had a sense of humour bypass.
hehehe thats pretty funny coming from you.marc71178 said:Someone's had a sense of humour bypass.
He should only get the MBE if Geraint gets dropped, though. For services to English cricket.Jono said:The difference is Geraint's crap, and should never have played test cricket... ever. In cases like these, Ponting did the spirit of cricket a favour by running out Geraint, because it was made even more clear to the world that he's useless.
I reckon Ponting should get an OBE or whatever the English got for winning the Ashes, for his run out.