subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Who is greater?
Interesting..maybe we should do Headley vs Hammond.Headley for me.
that is two guys who I've always seen as equal on ability but Hammond just has a much longer career soInteresting..maybe we should do Headley vs Hammond.
How about Sutcliffe?that is two guys who I've always seen as equal on ability but Hammond just has a much longer career so
a bit lesser than Headley and Hammond on ability imo but Headley's lack of matches hurt himHow about Sutcliffe?
And by the time war ended he pretty much was finished.Headley's last FC match has him making a stand as an opener against Frank Tyson, defintiely strong against pace.
Pretty much natural talent for Headley tbh. Basically came out from nowhere to be an ATG. Especially considering the batting around him. Him and Hammond are pretty close I think. I have Headley around 9th-10th I think. Hammond bit higher.Headley's last FC match has him making a stand as an opener against Frank Tyson, defintiely strong against pace.
**** yourself Sayonnara Bengali rascal bitçDefine love.
And poll also.
Especially his last match. Him returning to that last match is similar to Mike Tyson’s against Jake Paul.And by the time war ended he pretty much was finished.
A bad comparison honestly..... That was a piss poor joke and Mike fought only for the easy bag.Especially his last match. Him returning to that last match is similar to Mike Tyson’s against Jake Paul.
You watched it!A bad comparison honestly..... That was a piss poor joke and Mike fought only for the easy bag.
Ofcourse NOTYou watched it!
Shame on you!!!!