Migara
International Coach
So you are regerring to a super version of Carl Hooper?
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Garry Sobers vs Imran Khan
- Thread starter PlayerComparisons
- Start date
smash84
The Tiger King
I thought so, except bashing India, his record really isn't that great.
Migara
International Coach
Xould say Imran was a workhorse batsman.
smash84
The Tiger King
I feel like when we scrutinize Sobers record as we do of other players, he doesn't come across as impressive.
An upgrade on Carl Hooper sounds a bit low.
Migara
International Coach
The great WI side house batsmen like Hooper and Logie. Even the minnow side of SL had three or four batsmen better than those two. Comparing Imran's batting to Logie is outragous. Imran with the bat was very versatile like Sobers with the ball. He could stone wall, play strokes like a top order bator could use a long handle as a lower order bat. It is ridiculous no one looks at Imran's versatility with the bat.
subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Imran especially in ODIs did the smash and the steady build role very well.
But yeah, the problem here is that folks like @kyear2 want to pretend the 80s were like the 2000s when everyone and their uncle was averaging 40 as a baseline.
No, in the 80s virtually every side had a low to mid 30s lower order bat. Imran fits comfortably as a specialist bat respective to the era.
Kyear needs to dishonestly pretend Logie with two tons in 50 games was a better bat than Imran though is a real low.
subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
I agree Viv is better.
ankitj
Hall of Fame Member
Now do Imran's best 8 years with his secondary skill.
ankitj
Hall of Fame Member
subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Again, most impressive in this is that IK twice toured Australia and England in this period and scored well, and then scored well in series in India (MOS) and NZ with Hadlee.
OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
This period has two excellent series in England where he picked up 20 wickets and a series in Australia where he averaged 24, so it wasn't just India bashing like people are saying. Sobers' bowling peak had him putting up similar numbers to a good frontline pacer (in terms of actual number of wickets because he was around 4 wickets per match). Imran in his batting peak had great batting averages but only around 40 runs per game (because he had lots of not ours etc).
Definitely find Sobers' bowling peak more impressive than Imran's batting tbh. He combined good average + actual workload and wickets production more than Imran did.
Migara
International Coach
Who said Imran was like Sehwag? He could stonewall.
subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Even if we agree, it was a much shorter peak than Imran, only 1/3rd of his career whereas Imran it's 2/3rds.
Thala_0710
First Class Debutant
Probably even a lower one:
Did rough math on this. In the last 100 years of test cricket, there are 325 players to have scored more than 2000 runs in test cricket. Now since on avg about 1.5 times (6 vs 4) batters to bowlers play on avg in any test, the equivalent number for bowlers is 325/1.5=217 which I checked, gives 87 test wkts.
Now in the same period, 34 Batsman avg over 50 with min 2000 test runs, for bowlers with 87 test wkts the corresponding avg is 23 for 34/1.5=23 bowlers (both 23 represent separate stuff).
The number 23 also makes more sense to me intuitively than 25 which I feel is a bit on the higher side compared to a 50+ avg bat
OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's approximately 2/3rds for imran too. He averaged less than 30 for around 60 tests , then in his final 25-30 he became a 50+ average bat.
Saying he averaged close to 50 in the final decade of his career is technically true but slightly misleading because it's very skewed towards the back half of the decade. He averaged ~60 from 1987 onwards when his bowling declined. And even in this period even though he was an excellent batsman, he only had 50 or so runs per game which is much lower production than a proper 50 avg batsman. Sobers put together his batting and bowling peak simultaneously in a marginally more impressive way imo with comparable average + WPM of a frontline bowler.
ankitj
Hall of Fame Member
Fair point. Sobers had more specialist equivalent workload than Imran in their respective secondary discipline. But Imran had a superior average (not outs don't increase your average). I can call it dead heat in their secondary disciplines during their peaks but over entire careers I think Imran wins out marginally.
It's in their primary disciplines where Sobers had a clear edge so in sum I rate Sobers marginally higher. Things like slip catching gets at least evenly matched by Imran's captaincy and legacy he left behind.