Friendlies

[Blewy]

Ok i ran 2 friendlies for each side against random opposition who i thought would be in the same strength, they were CPU selected teams, here are the results...

 

[deckard]

Hey Blewy

Thanks for the friendlies. Just a couple of questions:

1. We get to change our bowling order right?
2. When and how did ND become such a force?

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

Very pleased with Auckland's performance, but also very annoyed at the mal-alignment (word?) of the scorecards. They aren't at all reader-friendly.

 

[Mr. P]

Very happy to cream the hell through Free State even if it is just Free State. I was happier still against Vic. How cool was that tied test??!!??

 

[age_master]

average results for Colts, though when bowling orders and pitch conditions are set up during the season the team is really expected to deliver.

 

[Blewy]

Hey Blewy

Thanks for the friendlies. Just a couple of questions:

1. We get to change our bowling order right?
2. When and how did ND become such a force?

1/ Bowling orders can be set at the start of the season, then we will be having a chance to change them mid season...

2/ Well ND always had a half decent side, but VC4 exagerated it a little IMO.. They now have 2 guys in 4d who ave over 50 and with a couple of decent bowlers they will go ok in 4d, 1d on the other hand... :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

 

[The Argonaut]

A great start for Qld in the friendlies comprehensively beating NSW and Mumbai. The batting fired up and the bowling though understrengthed performed well.

When we pick our bowling orders can we pick separate ones for the 4 and 1 day games. It's something that I didn't get right last season and had Flintoff bowling when I didn't want him to.

 

[Blewy]

Yeah Jason you can have 2 seperate bowling orders...

 

[Graham]

Are these resultsan accurate reflection of how individual players will perform or are they separate from the actual competition database that will be in operation?

 

[Rich2001]

Very pleased with Auckland's performance, but also very annoyed at the mal-alignment (word?) of the scorecards. They aren't at all reader-friendly.

Any chance of a screenie as I can't see anything wrong on my comp.

Here's what I see (saved it in a different file type to keep it small, that's why the colours are very poor)

 

[Simon]

1d friendlies coming at some stage???

 

[age_master]

my scorecards are excatly like Rich's

 

[Blewy]

Ok the final lot of 4 Day games...

Only 1 per team here... Sorry if you have already played that team...

One Day lot coming soon....

 

[Simon]

is there going to be anyone who wont beat me!
Doesnt matter, this side doesnt look much like what my 4day line up will be.

 

[nibbs]

damn. ND... :O :O :O

 

[nibbs]

ND have 1 or 2 good players but strewth, they had three emphatic wins in these friendlies. They even thrashed three pretty respectable sides, in Warwickshire, ACT and Hampshire.



Interesting...

 

[Graham]

Interesting that in one drawn game, the team following on declared when they were still in arrears. This would have meant a loss, not a draw. A little bug for Sri to iron out.

 

[nibbs]

Also South Australia were 199 ahead on the 1st innings against Yorkshire but choose not to enforce the follow on. Why???

 

[Craig]

Hey Blewy, can you do me a favour an e-mail the results so far?

I cant see it.

 

[Cloete]

a win, a draw and a loss :O