• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Frequent ball change made by England Team

reyrey

U19 Captain
Ball changes have been happening for ever. Anderson and Broad being the experienced pros they were got good at nagging for a ball change and knew better than anyone how to take advantage of a good ball. That's obviously been passed on.

As I mentioned in another thread the Duke balls in England have been sh!te since covid supply issues. I think the issue first was the glue used and then the leather. Those balls have zero chance of lasting as long as they are expected to. It's a miracle if they even make it to more than 50% of their expected life as a "good ball" so nagging for ball changes is almost guaranteed now.

Loads of crying and whinging about an issue that's on the umpires and those managing the game up top. Not an England player issue, although the sooner they move away from these sh!te Duke balls the better. Kookaburra is probably the way to go.
 
Last edited:

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Has anyone playing club cricket found the balls shite this season? I’ve had to replace a few going out of shape. Seems like a wider issue but could be a coincidence.
 

reyrey

U19 Captain
Has anyone playing club cricket found the balls ****e this season? I’ve had to replace a few going out of shape. Seems like a wider issue but could be a coincidence.
The Dukes had an okay time 2022 and 23. Still weren't up to their old standards though, but this year they seem worse than ever.
 

reyrey

U19 Captain
Isn’t a ball that is out of shape more likely to misbehave? Am I missing something here?
The issue is they get big and soft which makes it useless to bowl with.

Umps will change an out of shape ball regardless of what bowlers say, so they wouldn't get a chance to benefit from it.
 
Last edited:

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
I’m less talking about a ball going out of shape, because that’s not getting checked in the Cheshire 2nd XI 2nd division and more the seam bursting apart tbf
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
It's not the ball changes in general. It's balls being replaced with something that is nothing like the ball that was being used.
Which I acknowledged. But the idea it’s some English conspiracy is for low IQ buffoons.
 

the big bambino

Cricketer Of The Year
Why wouldn't you whinge about the ball unless its to get a better one? It is an obvious tactic and Matthews is right saying all your hard work has been punked. Since they've been handing out balls that seem to have re set the wear and tear, maybe they should offer complaining sides either the ball they have or one in the shed that's 20 overs older. I'd even give the ICC a few mangled up old compo cricket balls I kept for 30 years.
 

Son Of Coco

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Which I acknowledged. But the idea it’s some English conspiracy is for low IQ buffoons.
I believe it is just a coincidence that England have benefitted each time this has happened (note: only tests I am aware of are valid samples).

As everyone who has ever won an argument on the internet says:

#justsayin'
 

Line and Length

Cricketer Of The Year
A team doesn't change a ball. They point out to the umpire that a ball is out of shape/damaged and it's up to the umpires to approve a change and select a suitable ball. More often than not, they say the ball is OK and no change is necessary.
I recall a time when both batting and bowling sides were shown the replacement alongside the used ball and they could approve or challenge the suitability of the replacement. Perhaps if this was re-introduced there would be no grounds for complaint.
 

Top