SpaceMonkey
International Debutant
This pretty much sums it up for me. I look forward to it too!Can just see myself as an old man ranting at younger folk about how much better he was that his stats suggest.
This pretty much sums it up for me. I look forward to it too!Can just see myself as an old man ranting at younger folk about how much better he was that his stats suggest.
I'd agree totally with that statement, i think what puts him in the nearly "great catergory" for me would be the "big moment" potential he had at his best. I.e when England needed an innings he would give it to them (2nd innings Edgbastion) when they needed quick wickets, they got those.I think Atherton hit it on the head when he said “He has been a very good Test match cricketer - not a great one but a very good one who had a great series in 2005.”
He went on to add, "I suspect he’ll feel absolutely fulfilled". I do hope he is right about that last bit.
You'd be very lucky to see him play 4 more Tests. He might come through the Lord's Test but I can't see him last all five.It's starting to hit me that I'm only gonna see four more appearances from Freddie in the whites, and it's a bitter pill to swallow.
His body quite clearly isn't up to the demands of being a top level cricketer, given that he hasn't had an injury free home summer since 2005.Would have so much more respect if he gave up ODI and T20 cricket to play more Tests. But that doesn't seem to be the done thing any more.
True, and it's funny how little anyone cares. Maybe he should have been born in another country.freddie has one of the best records for an all-rounder in ODI cricket - way better than kapil, botham, chris cairns and, brace yourself for the big one, the great imran khan himself.
he would be, along with kallis, klusener and jayasuriya, among the top 5 ODI cricketers of all time. too bad his team has not won too many trophies to help this claim,.
In the "Johnson vs Flintoff" thread, the question was who would be more dominant over the next three years, I voted Johnson because I said I'd be suprised if Flintoff was still playing in all formats of the game in a year.This should be in Cricket Chat. It's not just an Ashes issue.
Either way, think someone called this months back actually. Can't say I'm too surprised. And TBH, I don't see that there was all that much alternative. Flintoff hasn't been fit to play a full Test series for yonks and it's not likely he ever will be again. He doesn't, in my view, have enough to offer the Test team any more, though that's obviously unfortunate.
Hopefully he can play the 2011 World Cup and focus all his efforts on ODIs in the meantime. Obviously I don't give a damn whether he plays the IPL or not, but clearly he would do.
Flintoff will be well remembered for his Test brilliance 2003/04-2006, but sadly not all that much apart from that. In the end, he was unable to escape the limitations of his batting and was unable to escape the self-imposed limitations of his bowling.
GingerFurball said:If he's fit enough, there's absolutely no reason why Flintoff shouldn't play in the IPL.
2 very important reasons why in my opinion he absolutely should play:
1. He's an average Test bowler. We can debate his merits until the thread is 100 pages long, but even if we only consider his England performances since Sri Lanka 03, he struggles to average under 30. He's a great bowler, but his statistics don't back that up. He is however, a superb limited overs bowler, and has been statisitcally the best death bowler in the world in ODIs over the last 3-4 years. If Flintoff was to give up one form of international cricket due to fitness constraints, then it should be Tests.
2. The next World Cup is in the subcontinent. The IPL represents a great chance for Flintoff to gain experience as to what is needed to be successful as a limited overs bowler in India.
I reckon he'll play the lot. The implication in his interview today was that he'd happily take all the painkillers in the world to get through the series - it's his last one so what is there to lose?You'd be very lucky to see him play 4 more Tests. He might come through the Lord's Test but I can't see him last all five.
Anyway, here's to the man. I'm not sure I like him, but he definitely is a Character, a damn good bowler every now and then, and in his 2005 heyday he was simply awesome.
Its not a myth, that article rather is baseless stats argument.Flintoff's awesomeness post 2005 is a myth.
I will remember him not as a great player but as an awesome entertainer.
Yet the reality is that most of the injuries (all the ankle ones if not this latest knee problem) were caused by something entirely within his power to change, which he was advised to change at 24 (may even have been younger actually), and did not.Always going to think 'how good could he have been?' if it wasn't for injuries. Such a shame, cause he has obviously worked so hard to try to overcome them.
Once you start overdoing it on painkillers you lose more than you gain.I reckon he'll play the lot. The implication in his interview today was that he'd happily take all the painkillers in the world to get through the series - it's his last one so what is there to lose?