No - it would have been much more convincing, and they would have finished on a song.sirjeremy11 said:Maybe Flem and Rig started this to attract publicity for Cricketweb.
Nice guys.
I dont beleive the spin they are trying now, they are now saying it was a prank on Richardson, NZ cricket should know how to lie better, and own up to the truth.Blewy said:Dumb Dumb Dumb....
Serioulsy NZ Cricket need to manage their captain a little better, to be playing silly pranks in the middle of a test is ridiculous...
It showed them laughing about it afterwards on the news.brettishere said:I dont beleive the spin they are trying now, they are now saying it was a prank on Richardson, NZ cricket should know how to lie better, and own up to the truth.
It's definately a hoax.brettishere said:I dont beleive the spin they are trying now, they are now saying it was a prank on Richardson, NZ cricket should know how to lie better, and own up to the truth.
What are you talking about? They showed the rest of the footage on Sports365... Richardson and Fleming were laughing about it.brettishere said:I dont beleive the spin they are trying now, they are now saying it was a prank on Richardson, NZ cricket should know how to lie better, and own up to the truth.
Nope, but I know for a fact that Sky Television are/have been reading this thread. It's their coverage.NZTailender said:Anywhere onlnie we can see the full video?
andyc said:
There's no way that was a hoax. Anyone who's seen that Advanced Hair Studios ad will know that cricketers can't act that well.
We know from the excerpts from Richardson's book that this comment isn't entirely true.Flemming also said " I get on very well with Mark"
So because their attempted "hoax" was blown early by their forgetfulness about internet braodcasts and we asked questions rather than hoping meekly that all is well in NZ Cricket and everyone gets on, you consider that sucked in? Good on ya.dantheman said:I don't want to say it but I TOLD YOU SO!!! Especially you Volty you were sucked in big time matey.:
I don't think "gullable" was ever in it, Daniel.So was gullable taken out of the dictionary Volty?