Bravo Belford! Bravo! I really couldnt have said it better myself. Like most of the unemployable, Richard's daily activities would no doubt consist of getting out of bed around 11, bowl of cerial while the computer is booting up (if it is even turned off at all), waste a few hours on the internet, afternoon snooze at about 2, get up around 6 for more snacks and internet until bed at around 2am.Belford said:Lawsy is right. A high post count is the mark of the unemployable and/or the aimless drifter.
If you don't need to sleep, and you have more time on your hands than most, you should be helping out at the soup kitchen, or writing the first great novel of the 21st century, or learning Japanese, not haunting an internet forum making thousands of banal observations.
Your life is a gift to be seized with both hands, not trudged through, filling time in meaningless ways.
lovelyburkey_1988 said:I Hate
Simon Hughes I think.Somerset said:Favourites: Ian Smith, Mark Nicholas, Mark Taylor, Michael Slater's been interesting on this tour too, Channel 4's analysis man who's name doesn't come to mind...
It really is amusing reading this uneducated garbage from someone who knows sod-all and makes such sweeping assumptions.John Laws CBE said:Bravo Belford! Bravo! I really couldnt have said it better myself. Like most of the unemployable, Richard's daily activities would no doubt consist of getting out of bed around 11, bowl of cerial while the computer is booting up (if it is even turned off at all), waste a few hours on the internet, afternoon snooze at about 2, get up around 6 for more snacks and internet until bed at around 2am.
Now this lifestyle is all very well if you are have the means to support it. But when you require the on-going assistence of the government to put food on the table it is unacceptable. Richard - I urge you to get out and take control of your life. Get out of the house, find a job and contribute to society. You will feel better about society and society will feel better about you.
Regards
John Laws CBE
wtf the nz commentary team more bias then the aussie one? please tell me your joking the australian commentary team is the most bias out of any sport's commentry's that i have ever herd. The only nz commentator i find bias is martin crowe.the WHOLE NZ commentary team, theyre worst than Lawry when it comes to bias
Good for you...username1234 said:wtf the nz commentary team more bias then the aussie one? please tell me your joking the australian commentary team is the most bias out of any sport's commentry's that i have ever herd. The only nz commentator i find bias is martin crowe.
the nz commentary team is the least bias i have ever heardusername1234 said:wtf the nz commentary team more bias then the aussie one? please tell me your joking the australian commentary team is the most bias out of any sport's commentry's that i have ever herd. The only nz commentator i find bias is martin crowe.
What about Ian Smith? I don't care too much when commentators are biased, but I feel it takes a bit a way from the value they might otherwise have as a reader of the game. Great commentators, like Richie for example, call the play on its merits rather than as a fan of any particular side. Plenty of both the channel 9 Australian bunch and the New Zealand commentary team do the opposite, and Ian Smith is the worst of the lot (along with Bill Lawry, perhaps).username1234 said:wtf the nz commentary team more bias then the aussie one? please tell me your joking the australian commentary team is the most bias out of any sport's commentry's that i have ever herd. The only nz commentator i find bias is martin crowe.
for once arjun i agree with you ravi shastri is **** & for me the most boring & dull commetator around;morever his jealousy for ganguly's success is evidentArjun said:Surprising to find Ravi Shastri's name in many of the 'best' lists. He's excessively biased towards a certain Ajit Agarkar. Nehra bowled rubbish in a match in Bangalore, and Shaz said his inclusion was baffling, but when put up had a slightly-better-than-terrible performance, and scored a few runs which meant nothing, he said it was foolish to leave him out of an ODI side. In a match where the Indians struggled to get a bonus point, Harbhajan played a needless rash shot to get out, after which Shaz castigated him, but when Agarkar played a foolish, near-impossible shot when the Indians lost a match in Dhaka, he said nothing!
I endorse that.bhajji24 said:for once arjun i agree with you ravi shastri is **** & for me the most boring & dull commetator around;morever his jealousy for ganguly's success is evident
Nothing wrong with thatArjun said:Surprising to find Ravi Shastri's name in many of the 'best' lists. He's excessively biased towards a certain Ajit Agarkar.