Do you really think Warne is/was a better batsman than Wasim? The Pakistani played nearly 40 less matches than Warne but hit three test centuries including a huge double, while Warne is yet to make any.Craig said:Or Twenty20
For me I have always picked an alternative all-time XI sticking clear of your Bradman and Sobers, everybody does it so I choose to be different.
Jack Hobbs
Sunil Gavaskar
George Headley
Sir Viv Richards
Graeme Pollock
Keith Miller
Allan Knott (my favourite keeper-batsman of all time)
Shane Warne
Wasim Akram
Richard Hadlee
Malcolm Marshall
12th man: Muttiah Muralitharan
Although on a spinning wicket you could take out a fast bowler and chuck in Murali. Richards would captain, I reckon that is one execellent side (tho' Warne may not bowl much )
no disrespect sjs. but i think you are way off target slotting in beefy at 7. i love him. may select him as a reserve for my test team even. but in one dayers??? no chance. flintoff is more handy as an all-rounder in one dayers. alternatively why not take bevan and let viv and sachin finish the fifth bowler's quota? or take kallis and put him at 6 and jones at 7?SJS said:1. Sachin Tendulkar
2. Adam Gilchrist
3. Viv Richards
4. Brian Lara
5. Ricky Ponting
6. Dean Jones
7. Ian Botham
8. Richard Hadlee
9. Saqlain Mushtaq
10. Michael Holding
11. Joel Garner
12. Shane Warne
Actually my problem came with the selection of the four 'best' bowlers as per my opinion. Hadlee, Holding, Garner and Saqlain. Unfortunately, except for Hadlee, the others arent much use with the bat and Hadlee wasnt a great one day bat.bagapath said:no disrespect sjs. but i think you are way off target slotting in beefy at 7. i love him. may select him as a reserve for my test team even. but in one dayers??? no chance. flintoff is more handy as an all-rounder in one dayers. alternatively why not take bevan and let viv and sachin finish the fifth bowler's quota? or take kallis and put him at 6 and jones at 7?
It was against a Zimbabwe that gave most major test teams a run for their money. They also beat India and Pakistan in tests IIRC.Craig said:And as for that double, wasn't that against Zimbabwe (admittly it would trash this current mob)?
Agreed. And Sobers would be better in the field.adharcric said:11 Sobers, easily. They would hit every ball for a boundary. The Bradmans might miss a few since the Sobers can actually bowl.
I never thought I'd see the Don's name in a reserve list.bagapath said:reserves: donald, waqar and lara
SobersSlifer said:Yes thats a good question. What if u had 11 Bradmans versus 11 Sobers' who would win?
Seriously?
It's everyone's favourite XI, so there is no debate about who choses who. Anyone can put their mother-in-law in if they want to.bagapath said:no disrespect sjs. but i think you are way off target slotting in beefy at 7. i love him. may select him as a reserve for my test team even. but in one dayers??? no chance. flintoff is more handy as an all-rounder in one dayers. alternatively why not take bevan and let viv and sachin finish the fifth bowler's quota? or take kallis and put him at 6 and jones at 7?
Assuming its test matches we are talking off, it will ALWAYS end in a draw. Unless its a timeless test.Slifer said:Yes thats a good question. What if u had 11 Bradmans versus 11 Sobers' who would win?
Seriously?