If they can't play I'm not sure how they can be counted.Why don't the cheats count? And the bunch of hopefuls aren't even through their respective careers yet. Bit early to judge. Also in this era where batting is supposedly a lot easier wouldn't averaging <30 be pretty good?
It's at least in part a batting dominated era because of the standard of bowling.Why don't the cheats count? And the bunch of hopefuls aren't even through their respective careers yet. Bit early to judge. Also in this era where batting is supposedly a lot easier wouldn't averaging <30 be pretty good?
Second best for Dizzy. Steyn would still be better.It's at least in part a batting dominated era because of the standard of bowling.
Question for everyone. If Dizzy Gillespie came along now, I reckon he'd be considered the best bowler in the world, or close to it. Thoughts?
This I supposeSecond best for Dizzy. Steyn would still be better.
Yeah, same for Fannie De Villiers and Sylvester Clarke too , I suppose...Second best for Dizzy. Steyn would still be better.
second best, just behind Steyn and ahead of Zaheer/Anderson ..It's at least in part a batting dominated era because of the standard of bowling.
Question for everyone. If Dizzy Gillespie came along now, I reckon he'd be considered the best bowler in the world, or close to it. Thoughts?
Arbitrary thought. Why and when did "skillsets" replce "skills"?High ceilings=players with the skillsets to succeed.
And I never said talent doesn't exist you ****s.
I said just behind Steyn and ahead of Anderson/Zak ....I wouldn't say just ahead. Dizzy was a great bowler and would be nearer to Steyn than Anderson/Zak.
He's been listening to too many Australian press conferences. The whole reason they're no good anymore is down to not executing their skillsets.Arbitrary thought. Why and when did "skillsets" replce "skills"?
Presumably a "skillset" is a set of multiple skills, so why do you need "sets", plural, rather than just a set?
Haha yeah that's precisely what I say when I want to avoid using the word talented. Pretty sure Phlegm was in the same boat there.You mean talented?
because they lost their credibility when they cheated. there is a huge asterisk now when talking about amir* or asif* and that makes all the difference.Why don't the cheats count? And the bunch of hopefuls aren't even through their respective careers yet. Bit early to judge. Also in this era where batting is supposedly a lot easier wouldn't averaging <30 be pretty good?