I do believe that he was picked because he was a good batsman for them and he did develop some respect from some of the players but it didnt work out since he wasnt a born leader to be honet. i do believe if they really wana change the team then they need to bring a player who is abit more agressive.This was reported on CricInfo yesterday. And SportsMax just reported on their news ticket that Chris Gayle has quit the captaincy.
AWTAI thought Chris Gayle did an excellent job as captain actually. West Indies won an ODI series in England, then looked good under him and took a Test in South Africa, then drew a series with Sri Lanka (after competing very well in the first Test) and won the ODI series. Against Australia West Indies looked quite good despite the 2-0 scoreline. The team certainly competed in every Test. In the ODI series the team was doomed to fail by some disastrous selection.
I wasn't a fan of Gayle's initial selection as captain, but I admit that he did a good job. Very sad to see him go, as I can't see anyone in the squad who's been tried in the role who is likely to do better than Gayle. It would have to be a fairly left-field choice.
Indeed. I guess even when good things happen to Windies cricket, they simply just don't last..I was really pleasantly surprised by his captaincy. The team seemed to really gel well with him in charge. Their record with him in charge has been pretty good too, hasn't it, bearing in mind he's missed a few tests since taking over due to injury?
Aye, thought exactly that.I was really pleasantly surprised by his captaincy.
3 1/2 games, no wins, 2 losses. He did things like having a deep point in place for the first ball of the innings, and bowling Fidel Edwards with no fine leg. He surely would have improved, but Gayle for sure looked the more capable captain to me.Sarwan only got a game and a half as skipper didn't he?
Which could not be applied to cricket and thank God for that. Cricket is not like other means of employment - nor is international cricket employment.Don't want to take your thread off topic but it's a really interesting point you raise there. When Attapatu returned from injury in 2006 Jayawardene kept the captaincy after doing such a good job, whereas Strauss got shafted somewhat in the same year when Flintoff returned from injury, seems as Flintoff was only a stand-in himself it was pretty poor.
I think if you get injured and someone does a good job in your place, tough ****. Unless you're pregnant of course as there are laws affecting people in those instances!
Well I'm racking my brains for this one.I though Chris Gayle did an excellent job as captain actually. West Indies won an ODI series in England, then looked good under him and took a Test in South Africa, then drew a series with Sri Lanka (after competing very well in the first Test) and won the ODI series. Against Australia West Indies looked quite good despite the 2-0 scoreline. The team certainly competed in every Test. In the ODI series the team was doomed to fail by some disastrous selection.
I wasn't a fan of Gayle's initial selection as captain, but I admit that he did a good job. Very sad to see him go, as I can't see anyone in the squad who's been tried in the role who is likely to do better than Gayle. It would have to be a fairly left-field choice.