I realise he's an Englishman, but I'm pretty sure he was Australia-based since he was very young.PY said:Think he might be referring to the fact that Symonds is an Englishman and has been playing county cricket since he was a teenager.
<quack> You're right. Otherwise he'd have been good.Son Of Coco said:When did Symonds move to Australia? He was playing hockey in my area when he was 13 so he must have been pretty young. I think it's fair to suggest he didn't learn to play cricket like that in England! haha
haha......um.....yeah, of course. That's what I meant.luckyeddie said:<quack> You're right. Otherwise he'd have been good.
Andrew Strauss was born in SA to British parents working at the British embasy. He has lived and grown up in Britain.steds said:Also, isn't Strauss from South Africa, not Melbourne?
Thanks for that. I was under the impression his family lived in SA until he was about 6, had 18 months in Melbourne & then moved to blighty.gio said:Andrew Strauss was born in SA to British parents working at the British embasy. He has lived and grown up in Britain.
The fact he was born there would be help.BoyBrumby said:Thanks for that. I was under the impression his family lived in SA until he was about 6, had 18 months in Melbourne & then moved to blighty.
Under the current rules would he have qualified for SA before he debuted for England?
Fair point. But with foreign born or raised we kinda have it both ways, don't we? Many is the time that Greg Rusedski walks onto the court as the British number two & leaves it as the unfortunate Canadian!Richard said:If someone is listed as an English sportsman, they're an English sportsman, simple as that for me.
Even the like of Billy Murdoch and co. who played for two coutries (Kepler Wessels and John Traicos are two more recent examples) don't bother me in the slightest.
I wouldn't even mind if Craig Spearman of Stuart Law played for England... well, I would, but not because they've played for someone else. Because I believe the team would be better without them, brilliant a player as Law undoubtedly is.
As far as I'm concerned, he's as Canadian as The Lumberjack Song and Moosehead beer, and just as ambiguous as both.BoyBrumby said:Fair point. But with foreign born or raised we kinda have it both ways, don't we? Many is the time that Greg Rusedski walks onto the court as the British number two & leaves it as the unfortunate Canadian!
Do you feel tha same about, say Lennox Lewis or Owen Hargreaves tho?luckyeddie said:As far as I'm concerned, he's as Canadian as The Lumberjack Song and Moosehead beer, and just as ambiguous as both.
(I hope Moosehead's Canadian - it's weaselwee anyway)
Admittedly he does sport the most comical Canadian/German accent (and not too sure about the greasy perm either), but he at least had something of a grounding in English football tradition what with a dad from Bolton.marc71178 said:Owen Hargreaves - not really a good example as he's worse than Rusedski!
Agree with Space Monkey on this one. This should be the same in every Test playing country!!SpaceMonkey said:If they want to play for england they're as good as english for my money. What i dont agree with is the players playing county cricket with an EU passport or with English grandparents that have no intention of ever playing for England.
I'm inclined to think they wouldn't....JASON said:when several players of caribbean origin were selected for England not too long ago, old gooners like Norman Tebbitt (Lord Tebbitt of where ever) wanted to test their loyalty to England (ie when England played West Indies - implying that the likes of De freitas, Gladstone Small, Devon Malcolm were not committed or not giving off their 100% against the West Indies or attempting to sabotage England's cause from within)- which later became known as the 'Tebbitt Test'
(IIRC) .
I wonder if the same old geezers raise this when a "White" boy from South Africa or a "Fair Dinkum Aussie" or "Sheila" plays for England!!!![]()