silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
Overreaction there mate. It's not a big deal, boards whinge to each other all the time.
are any or all of these international venues with reasonably large stadiums and good facilities? then the indians wouldn't have anything to complain about...else there could be complaints and justified ones as well, however the ecb doesn't really have a leg to stand on as far as arguments over the indian venues go....I completely understand why India have done what they've done here, but I also completely understand why England are complaining.
What I don't understand is why anyone would pain England as the bad guys as this situation. If India came to England and played two Tests at Southampton and Cardiff, followed by ODIs at Bristol, Guildford, Chester-le-Street, Taunton, New Road, Grace Road and Chelmsford, the BCCI would be furious. So would Cricket Australia, or any other national cricket organisation.
Just another portent of the eventual East-West split in world cricket, unfortunately.
I am not really concerned about the Boards whinnings. I just found some of the opinions really stupid and at times ignorant, esp from those who claim to be world travellers and take extra care to not offend others.Overreaction there mate. It's not a big deal, boards whinge to each other all the time.
Err, yes, I do know what it is, don't start bringing out the Wiki. I'm well aware of the history of the CCI, but it is not a high-profile venue any more. The Wankhede is far more, and yes, I realise it's unavailable - so just leave Mumbai off the agenda if so.Do you even know what the CCI is? It's the Brabourne Stadium. It has hosted 17 test matches is one of the most historic stadiums in Indian cricket.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brabourne_Stadium
Far more people looking for the excuse to go off about complaints about "Asian takeovers" than actual complaints, in my experience.I feel they're entitled to bitch about the Asian takeover, and we're entitled to roll our eyes
ECB would flip out even more if they left Mumbai off the agenda completely.Err, yes, I do know what it is, don't start bringing out the Wiki. I'm well aware of the history of the CCI, but it is not a high-profile venue any more. The Wankhede is far more, and yes, I realise it's unavailable - so just leave Mumbai off the agenda if so.
That too .wasn't the moaning last time due to a lot of travelling back and forth rather than a more logical movement round the country?
Chepauk Stadium Chennai > CCI.ECB would flip out even more if they left Mumbai off the agenda completely.
What? I can't see the relevance at all. The CCI is in Mumbai... it's the city that's more important than the ground itself, really.Chepauk Stadium Chennai > CCI.
I don't think Mumbai was the venue they were complaining about. It's the easiest the travel to for both English fans and has some of the best facilities.Whether that's true or not in this case... the Chepauk is still a more prominent stadium than the CCI.
The ECB are hardly going to be moaning about not playing at the Wankhede, given it's unavailable. You'd imagine if they're not happy playing at the Brabourne, they'd prefer Mumbai to have been left-out.
You said that the CCI "never has been" a frontline stadium. That is such an obviously false statement that you clearly had no clue what you were talking about. As explained repeatedly the Brabourne is in almost every way a better stadium than Wankehede. And Bombay is obviously a very convenient city for England fans. There isn't a shred of evidence that the ECB is complaining about using the Brabourne instead of the Wankhede as opposed to the rest of the itenary. This is just another of your bizarre arguments and as far as I can tell not a single other English poster is complaing about Brabourne either.Err, yes, I do know what it is, don't start bringing out the Wiki. I'm well aware of the history of the CCI, but it is not a high-profile venue any more. The Wankhede is far more, and yes, I realise it's unavailable - so just leave Mumbai off the agenda if so.