grecian
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yep would have been a much better replacement, IMHO.I shall continue beating the Graham Napier for the England T20 side drum.
Yep would have been a much better replacement, IMHO.I shall continue beating the Graham Napier for the England T20 side drum.
He just has that excitement factor that goes well in a T20 side. 90mph yorkers, and the ability to spank it into the next town.Yep would have been a much better replacement, IMHO.
Nah disagree, as you probably would think with my lover for Trego, t20 is an odd animal, you just need a short impact to win matches, so experience can mean little, after all bringing in Lumb & Sidey when we won the world cup was a master-stroke. The form can easily make someone who was a nobody into a somebody because the other side may not be set up against them.The last thing you want to do at this stage is bring in someone with no international experience into a big tournament. As boring as Woakes coming in for Stokes is I'd still back him to easily outperform Trego. Least Woakes has been playing recently and England know exactly what he's capable of- which at this point a week before their first game is important.
I think they're all in training, Trego has hit at the top of the order. I guess I'd find your lack of love for the like of Napes and Trigger less perturbing if you didn't still think dirtbag was okay, because he may turn out to be not that horrible in t-20. Why just keep on going for established England players when they've been proven to be crap, rather than might be crap. Which I think was Trego's point on twitter. So you don't think anyone can do better than Luke Wright, great.haha I tried to not let my view on Trego get in the way of what I was saying as I was trying to keeping it general about untested players playing out of season and without match practice . Still think asking Napier and Trego (who haven't played any cricket since the start of January and presumably in preseason at the moment) to go into a world cup in 7 days is fairly ludicrous. Napier if all things were equal would probably be a better bet for a one off tournament than Woakes. Trego I'd suggest not. Bowling is poor and likely wouldn't be used and he's an inferior batsmen to Luke Wright imo which about says it all.
I think they're all in training, Trego has hit at the top of the order. I guess I'd find your lack of love for the like of Napes and Trigger less perturbing if you didn't still think dirtbag was okay, because he may turn out to be not that horrible in t-20. Why just keep on going for established England players when they've been proven to be crap, rather than might be crap. Which I think was Trego's point on twitter. So you don't think anyone can do better than Luke Wright, great.
Neither him or Napier's fault they've been ignored before, maybe they'd have been terrible, but to go back to ones they know will be awful is just dogmatic and stubborn, clearly frightened they'll be proved wrong. which is no way of picking any thing.
Napier's non-selection almost seems like the management decided that he wasn't good enough and they're not risking being proven wrong.Trego's bowling would basically be a non-factor in T20 internationals IMO and I do think there are better batsmen available. Belongs in the conversation though, for sure.
Napier should've been playing for England in T20 cricket for years though really.
I think you still have to back both Parry and Tredwell. Might be a big ask to ask Moeen to play a big role with the ball in those conditions though.Sounds like dew could inpact the tournament quite a bit. Don't know how that will affect England's team but given their first three games are night games in chittagong maybe the spin attack may not be the best idea after all.