About the same as you know about the up-and-coming English talent, I should guess.jamesryfler said:
And what would you know about the quality of spinners in the Duleep Trophy ?
There is no such team in existance though.Richard said:It would, IMO, be more beneficial for England A to play in the Duleep Trophy than The Academy.
England A - second best English team which can make the squad. It is another matter that the players in their early 20s dont seem to get into the fringes of being selected for selection (Anderson is obviously an exception).here is no such team in existance though. And why should players in their late 20's/early 30's get the experience that will not serve the National side long-term? Why not give those under 24/25 that opportunity?
I know that, but that team no longer exists in favour of the IMO more worthwhile Academy.Pratyush said:England A - second best English team which can make the squad.
I reckon the results are not the idea behind the participation.Pratyush said:Its good to have the young players be given a chance too but they would struggle very badly in the Duleep Trophy.
Yes, and a proper England A team would also lose but I believe they would benefit more as they would not lose as badly as a young team. It would be highly demoroloising for a young inexperienced team to play in the Duleep Trophy. It would be like a Kent or Glamorgan asked to play vs Australia in Australia (not exactly but yuo get the idea)I reckon the results are not the idea behind the participation
It cant be helped if the selectors put the wrong people in the England A squad and do not get in the right players who they think would make the England squad in the endknow that, but that team no longer exists in favour of the IMO more worthwhile Academy
I dont have problems with England sending 15 year olds or 30 year olds as part of their A side. I would like the best players likely to come into the team as part of such a tour like India sent an A side to the Windies recently and it turned out useful for the players looming in the wings for international selection.Why is it that India can produce test players at 16 or 17 yet you (Pratyush) begrudge England not sending an 'A' team (of 25+ year olds) over as opposed to the (IMO) splendid idea of giving the youngsters a chance to get experience of a higher standard of cricket TOGETHER?
Methinks you vastly overestimate the strength of Indian domestic Cricket in that post.Pratyush said:Yes, and a proper England A team would also lose but I believe they would benefit more as they would not lose as badly as a young team. It would be highly demoroloising for a young inexperienced team to play in the Duleep Trophy. It would be like a Kent or Glamorgan asked to play vs Australia in Australia (not exactly but yuo get the idea)
I dont. The Duleep Trophy is comprised of the best 5 teams from each zone. The batsmen are very difficult to dismiss in India and many of them average over 50 in first lass cricket, vastly due to the pitches.Methinks you vastly overestimate the strength of Indian domestic Cricket in that post
I hope the question wasnt asked sarcastically. Sri Lanka A just defeated India A and Pakistan A in the one day tournament in Calcutta itself. Sri Lanka A consists of players like Russell Arnold and other good players who can play in turning pitches which an England Colts or Academy team certainly would struggle to. An England A may learn some thing but they would struggle a bit too.Pratyush, how do you think Sri Lanka A would fare in the Duleep Trophy?
These matches were held in Sri Lanka? Then it clearly shows how bad the English selectors lead by Greaveny are. If players from an English second string side can perform against quality players from Sri Lanka A, in their home nation, they should indeed by vying for ebing selected for the National team. Whichever side plays, they should be the ones who are vying for spotd in the English team when they play Duleep Tropy squads, else they will struggle real badly. England A should ideally comprise of the best English players eyeing for spots in the national team which doesnt usually happen. It is said that if Tendulkar was an English Player, he would have made his debut when he was 28-29. How James Anderson managed to get selected at such a young age in England still astonishes me.The question was asked as a leader because England Academy played - and matched - Sri Lanka A over the course of last winter's programme in both 1-day and 3-day games, with the hosts coming out marginally on top, and England having much the better of the Sri Lankan U19s.
WRT Tendulkar, I think that's a little extreme :rolleyes:Pratyush said:These matches were held in Sri Lanka? Then it clearly shows how bad the English selectors lead by Greaveny are. If players from an English second string side can perform against quality players from Sri Lanka A, in their home nation, they should indeed by vying for ebing selected for the National team. Whichever side plays, they should be the ones who are vying for spotd in the English team when they play Duleep Tropy squads, else they will struggle real badly. England A should ideally comprise of the best English players eyeing for spots in the national team which doesnt usually happen. It is said that if Tendulkar was an English Player, he would have made his debut when he was 28-29. How James Anderson managed to get selected at such a young age in England still astonishes me.
Whereas the academy players are clearly there for the sightseeing and partying?Pratyush said:These players are vying for national selection because of which they perform to the best of their ability.