His future isn't in ODI's, but he still deserves a token place in the 30.Tim said:I dunno about that..I think Key's future is not ODI's unfortunately. He looks to be in the same boat that Craig Cumming recently found himself in for NZ.
Craig said:Currently he would be 2nd in line for a Test spot (behind Collingwood), when Pietersen becomes available, he would be 3rd in line IMO.
He (Pieterson) may not have gotten into the SA side that soon. Our top four is pretty much settled: Smith, Gibbs, Rudolph, Kallis. Maybe he could have replaced Rudolph if he had waited but the selectors probably didn't want to mess with the top order with Gary Kirsten gone now. Rudolph is an extremely talented batsman though and a pretty useful bowler. We also have players such as JP Duminy, Andrew Puttick, AB de Villiers and Stephen Cook coming through (as well as a few I may have forgottenLangeveldt said:Hahah, obviously not...
Its a shame he felt he had to leave SA to get international cricket.. It seems to me that they have relaxed the national team quota a bit with Gibbs + Makhaya coming through..
Saw the Warwickshire v Northants game today, it was a bit like watching a Southern African 2nd XI...
_Ed_ said:Craig Cumming was an extremely bizarre case.
The selectors' meeting would have gone something like this:
"What are Craig Cumming's stats, Sir Richard?"
"Averages in the mid to upper 30s in FC and under 20 in domestic one-day"
"Ah, so that means he must be a top class one day batsman, lets put him in to open against Pakistan, he should have no troubles dealing with Shoaib and Sami!"
Like who?marc71178 said:I wouldn't necessarily say he's 2nd in line behind Collingwood - there's a group of players who would all be in with a shout after Collingwood.
that doesnt mean you put him in the wrong form of the game in the wrong batting position and expect him to succeed now does it?Adamc said:There is no room for him in the Test side though. He has a weakness against innocuous medium-pacers.![]()
i dont know why collingwood should be first in line ATM....his form in ODIs has been disastrous for nearly a year now.marc71178 said:I wouldn't necessarily say he's 2nd in line behind Collingwood - there's a group of players who would all be in with a shout after Collingwood.
there isnt really much of a point in including him in the 30 if he isnt going to be considered at all.Andre said:His future isn't in ODI's, but he still deserves a token place in the 30.
As does Butcher, but that's another story...
so whats new?Richard said:If the selectors seriously think these are the 30 best one-day cricketers in the country who have not made themselves unavailable for ODIs they are having some big, very bad, joke.
Why should Gloucs or Glam deserve players in the squad, incidentally? International selection is judged on individual performance, not team success.
Simon Jones has to be the worst ODI selection ever. Average over 130, ER of nearly 6-an-over.
Yeah agreed, Don't know what is coming through in the bowling department at the mo.. Zondeki and Ngam seem to be inconsistant and injury prone.. At least Ntini and Nel are performing (although Nel had a poor tour of NZ)Protea said:He (Pieterson) may not have gotten into the SA side that soon. Our top four is pretty much settled: Smith, Gibbs, Rudolph, Kallis. Maybe he could have replaced Rudolph if he had waited but the selectors probably didn't want to mess with the top order with Gary Kirsten gone now. Rudolph is an extremely talented batsman though and a pretty useful bowler. We also have players such as JP Duminy, Andrew Puttick, AB de Villiers and Stephen Cook coming through (as well as a few I may have forgotten) so I'm not sure how much of a loss it's going to be. Anyway, we don't need batsman, we need bowlers!!
Possibly because it's tripe....chris.hinton said:No doubt that Marc would have something to say about what i have just said