Starfighter
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Nothing I said is factually incorrect.
Making your usual contribution I see.
Nothing I said is factually incorrect.
Did he get anyone out in 03 final, just out of interest? Or the 07? I don’t know that he bowled all that well in the 96 final but can’t recall. I think he may have got a couple in 99.I'm serious. McGrath had singularly unimpressive figures of 1-51 in a relatively low scoring match in which Pollock took 5-36 and Donald 4-32, so it's not like the conditions weren't favourable for him either. It was Warne who turned the match after McGrath was easily handled by the openers, and the only wicket he wound up taking was Boucher, far from being one of South Africa's main batsmen; Contra your claim of him taking out the opposition's main batsmen in important matches.
And "nearly" only counts with horseshoes and hand grenades champ. Otherwise we would be discussing how, Klusener "nearly" won South Africa the match, with McGrath being ineffective and expensive in a must win game and choking when it mattered the most.
I think he got some choker out in 03, but that was already after Australia had scored 359/2 batting first. India were never going to get that. Same thing in 07, Australia batted first and got a huge total. Easy peasy after that. In 99 Warne did all the heavy lifting while in 96 he got tonked around by De Silva and co.did he get anyone out in 03 final, just out of interest? Or the 07? I don’t know that he bowled all that well in the 96 final but can’t recall. I think he may have got a couple in 99.
I know it’s only a small sample size of four wc finals (winning three), compared to other players who took their teams to so many more.
Oh.
Nothing incorrect, no. Just typically tendentiously slanted. I especially like the bit about "tougher home conditions", when most away batsmen were giving "rabbit in the headlights" performances in Australia during his time. His best performance of 8-24 vs Pakistan in Perth being a prime example.Nothing I said is factually incorrect.
Making your usual contribution I see.
Yeah, you're not very good with the facts thing, I suggest you leave it to people who actually watch cricket rather than just bring up little anecdotes without context.Nothing incorrect, no. Just typically tendentiously slanted. I especially like the bit about "tougher home conditions", when most away batsmen were giving "rabbit in the headlights" performances in Australia during his time. His best performance of 8-24 vs Pakistan in Perth being a prime example.
Did you ever think that maybe the rabbit in the headlights performances were because McGrath was a brilliant bowler?Nothing incorrect, no. Just typically tendentiously slanted. I especially like the bit about "tougher home conditions", when most away batsmen were giving "rabbit in the headlights" performances in Australia during his time. His best performance of 8-24 vs Pakistan in Perth being a prime example.