Agreed, what a player. That away average must have hurt him - no doubt in no small part due to his dismal 50/51 series.am quite disappointed to see compton's name come up so early. expected him to crack the top 25. interesting to say the least.
Yeah, I rate Hayden higher than most but I thought his adjusted and away averages might hurt him. You're right though - being a key contributor to a phenomenally successful team must more than make up for it. I'd imagine it's similar for Clive Lloyd.Hayden was always going to be higher than expected because Aus won a **** load when he was playing. I imagine the 380 helps his score a load too.
Thanks DoG. You had a post with the ratings for the greatest Test innings of all time.Innings were ratings as follows:
1st test: 75 (5.29)
2nd test: 72 (7.72) & 67 (7.29)
3rd test: 18 (1.33)
4th test: 120 (12.69) & 12 (0.91)
Series I/W average of 5.87.
Lara's series against Australia in 1999 had an I/W average of 9.17.
It was in response to me on this pageThanks DoG. You had a post with the ratings for the greatest Test innings of all time.
IIRC, Lara's innings came out on top with a rating of 24 or 25.
Can you point me to that post? I am unable to find it through CW search.
May be this ranking exposes some of our biases? May be our perceptions are colored rather than this system being faulty?Really though we would have seen LLoyd, Chanderpaul and Younis before Worrell and May.
True. I personally am not surprised with Chanderpaul being rated highly, he is very underrated imo.May be this ranking exposes some of our biases? May be our perceptions are colored rather than this system being faulty?