Viscount Tom
International Debutant
Very pleased to see Leyland in there.
Redpath's great innings:Redpath!! My old mans favourite player. What were his 3 great innings? Harsh photo for Cullinan lol.
Looks about right to me, apart from Redpath, though I know little about him.Ponsford, Redpath, and presumably Lawry in front of Arthur Morris. Nice.
There is no doubt that Morris was great to watch, but I've always thought that his stats and reputation hinge too much on the years immediately after the War. Once Bedser and Laker matured, then Statham and Tyson came along for England, and Ramadhin and Valentine for the West Indies, his averaged took a significant drop. In his first 4 series between 1946 and 1950 Morris averaged 67.68. But against better bowling he averaged 34.76 in his last 27 Tests. Admittedly, 34.76 isn't that bad for an opening batsman, but it seems mis-matched when put along side the tributes and his glowing reputation.Looks about right to me, apart from Redpath, though I know little about him.
maybe a ratio of top:second:third - if it's over a threshold it adds a penalty calculationHere is the thing about Cullinan. I am unhappy with him being so far up, because it shows a slight flaw in my top opposition average calculation. Let me explain:
vs. top tier opposition (7 tests against Australia, 1 against Pakistan), he scored 265 adjusted runs at an average of 20.38
vs. 2nd tier opposition, he scored 908 adjusted runs at an average of 39.48
vs. 3rd tier opposition, he scored 2842 runs at an average of 54.65
A huge difference in averages between the tiers. I multiply the runs against top tier by 1.5 and the 3rd tier by 0.5, thus giving a new total of 2726 at an average of 39.80.
Is there a better way to do this? He scored so many runs against 3rd tier opposition that it really makes his average higher than it should be.
Cheers for that, I had never seen the 63 vs India scorecard before.Redpath's great innings:
63 vs. India at Chennai 1969 (14.69)
5th Test: India v Australia at Chennai, Dec 24-28, 1969 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
171 vs. England at Perth 1970 (13.82)
2nd Test: Australia v England at Perth, Dec 11-16, 1970 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
159 vs. New Zealand at Auckland 1974 (14.96)
3rd Test: New Zealand v Australia at Auckland, Mar 22-24, 1974 | Cricket Scorecard | ESPN Cricinfo
The match against New Zealand also featured a great knock by Dougeh Walters in the first dig. Without those two innings, New Zealand might have won their first series against Australia.
That is fine I think. You are multiplying the tier 3 average by 0.5 which means Cullinan is effectively averaging 27.3 against that group. Similarly he is effectively averaging 30.8 against tier 1. So his runs against tier 3 teams are at a lesser effective average than the runs scored against tier 1 and 2 teams. In other words the fact that he scored so many runs against tier 3 opposition is affecting him negatively.Here is the thing about Cullinan. I am unhappy with him being so far up, because it shows a slight flaw in my top opposition average calculation. Let me explain:
vs. top tier opposition (7 tests against Australia, 1 against Pakistan), he scored 265 adjusted runs at an average of 20.38
vs. 2nd tier opposition, he scored 908 adjusted runs at an average of 39.48
vs. 3rd tier opposition, he scored 2842 runs at an average of 54.65
A huge difference in averages between the tiers. I multiply the runs against top tier by 1.5 and the 3rd tier by 0.5, thus giving a new total of 2726 at an average of 39.80.
Is there a better way to do this? He scored so many runs against 3rd tier opposition that it really makes his average higher than it should be.