Jono
Virat Kohli (c)
Well obviously[/Kelsey Grammer voice]silentstriker said:Slight difference between Australia and China when it comes to human rights records.
Well obviously[/Kelsey Grammer voice]silentstriker said:Slight difference between Australia and China when it comes to human rights records.
The first Chinese ODI team will probably be chained to some railway-under-construction after losing to Afghanistan by 200 runs.Samuel_Vimes said:Yay. Great. Another country with appalling human rights records to play cricket.
Yet they are hosting the OlympicsSamuel_Vimes said:Yay. Great. Another country with appalling human rights records to play cricket.
Yeah, I'd prefer them to stop executing more people than all the other countries put together, first.Samuel_Vimes said:Yay. Great. Another country with appalling human rights records to play cricket.
A great deal. Look at Zimbabwe.shortpitched713 said:What the heck does that have to do with them playing cricket?
The reason Zimbabwe lost Test status was not because of human rights or any other such "internal affairs". They lost Test status because they were horrible, due to most of their quality players being unwilling to play for them. I think China would make all of their best players play for them so I don't think they'll have any such similar problem.Samuel_Vimes said:A great deal. Look at Zimbabwe.
That's right, they'll make them play whether they like it or not.shortpitched713 said:The reason Zimbabwe lost Test status was not because of human rights or any other such "internal affairs". They lost Test status because they were horrible, due to most of their quality players being unwilling to play for them. I think China would make all of their best players play for them so I don't think they'll have any such similar problem.
nightprowler10 said:That's right, they'll make them play whether they like it or not.
I'm not saying its a good thing, or that I agree with it, but I'm saying its got nothing to do with whether they should be allowed to play cricket.nightprowler10 said:That's right, they'll make them play whether they like it or not.
Like it or not, politics is, and always has been, a part of sport. Sport can play such a large role in the national identity of a nation, of course politics will have an effect on it. I certainly don't think China's human rights record should be disregarded if they're to play cricket, just as Zimbabwe's shouldn't and South Africa's wasn't.shortpitched713 said:I'm not saying its a good thing, or that I agree with it, but I'm saying its got nothing to do with whether they should be allowed to play cricket.
They weren't (well, from the 70's, at least, when global opposition became so pronounced). I think they were re-admitted at roughly around the same time the cricket team was.shortpitched713 said:By the way as a side question, does anyone know whether South Africa were allowed to play in the Olympics during the apartheid era?
cameeel said:Where are they going to get good fast bowlers from? China aren't exactly known for having a tall population (Yao Ming excepted)
Its changingcameeel said:Where are they going to get good fast bowlers from? China aren't exactly known for having a tall population (Yao Ming excepted)
Stephen Morgan, an economics professor at the University of Melbourne, found that the average Chinese 17-year-old boy was 2.7 inches taller in 1995 than in 1955. The diet of the average Chinese child, especially in the cities and along the coast, improved dramatically after free market reforms began in 1978.
In contrast, "Americans have not grown (in height) in 25 years,"