honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
Yeah but that is not the part I am doubting.His innings in Karachi just showed he can bat very very long and has the mental capacity for it.
Yeah but that is not the part I am doubting.His innings in Karachi just showed he can bat very very long and has the mental capacity for it.
I would go with solid because even with those numbers he wasn't a top 5 batsman in any category, and he needed to be more impactful overall. That average is also helped by the fact that he remained not out against the Kiwis, because other than that important knock he only had a 50+ score once in the WC.That's not a solid world cup, that's a great one. That average + SR combo is exceptional. I think Pakistan were let down by that horror show against WI. Babar has also added exceptional T20 performances to his LO credentials.
I would go with solid because even with those numbers he wasn't a top 5 batsman in any category, and he needed to be more impactful overall. That average is also helped by the fact that he remained not out against the Kiwis, because other than that important knock he only had a 50+ score once in the WC.
which killer knocks? a group stage 100?Bairstow averages less than 50
Rassie has a very small sample size and Imam is actually a damn good opening bat in the limited format but obviously not a great.
But we're discussing Babar Azam here, who has already played killer knocks in global tournaments (the same can't be said for Kohli) and is exceptional in any other series format. Obviously he needs another 3-4 years in the game for longevity but he isn't too far from being one of the very best at this rate.
Have some dahi in sehri bro.Ah yeah you're right, I looked up stats yesterday and was quoting part of Imam's numbers instead
Lack of caffeine is killing me.
One more than Kohli lololololwhich killer knocks? a group stage 100?
https://www.espncricinfo.com/series...kistan-4th-match-pool-b-656405/full-scorecard (so funny how you forget these thrashings)Have some dahi in sehri bro.
One more than Kohli lolololol
India would've had 3 if they had Babar at 3 instead.https://www.espncricinfo.com/series...kistan-4th-match-pool-b-656405/full-scorecard (so funny how you forget these thrashings)
https://www.espncricinfo.com/series...india-1st-match-group-b-433558/full-scorecard (his first WC inning ever)
lolololol
Also Kohli is a WC winner which Babar will never be due to Pakistan's ongoing mediocrity lolololol
pak would have more than one if they had sreesanth.India would've had 3 if they had Babar at 3 instead.
Sreesanth over Gul is also a fair call.pak would have more than one if they had sreesanth.
Group stage 100 in a must-win match...but you do you.which killer knocks? a group stage 100?
I think Leno should watch more cricket.I think PaulLennon and jayjay should discuss this further