The maximum formerly known as DLF.What are we going to call a DLF maximum from now on?
Sixer may be ..What are we going to call a DLF maximum from now on?
I don't care what they say, I'll carry on calling it the DLF maximum, you can't kill tradition like thatWhat are we going to call a DLF maximum from now on?
Fair enough, didn't mean to cause any offence.I don't care what they say, I'll carry on calling it the DLF maximum, you can't kill tradition like that
Will be interesting to see if another company will pay as much. What DLF ($45 million) paid was about the same as the last profit figure I heard about IPL. Not sure that was yearly profit or cumulative but either way if the next company prays half of what DLF did, it will affect their profits in a significant way.They'll find another company.
God help us.They'll find another company.
hahahahaha you're in formTom Waterhouse to take over the naming rights.
"I don't know how they hit the big sixes..."
Yea but year on year, the franchises also pay less, plus the main source of revenue (the TV contract) is a ten year deal - guaranteed income. I'm not saying it won't affect their profits (obviously ANY reduction will), but OP's 'hope' is misplaced. It's still a profitable venture, and will remain so at least until the end of the initial ten year contract. Then it will depend on the situation then, and how the league is restructured (especially the payment by the teams to the BCCI).Will be interesting to see if another company will pay as much. What DLF ($45 million) paid was about the same as the last profit figure I heard about IPL. Not sure that was yearly profit or cumulative but either way if the next company prays half of what DLF did, it will affect their profits in a significant way.
Tom Waterhouse to take over the naming rights.
"I don't know how they hit the big sixes..."
What are we going to call a DLF maximum from now on?