• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Did Marshall and McGrath have it easier?

kyear2

International Coach
I think it does matter. A 300 in WI in the 80s isn't the same as in Pakistan.
So first it was about the runs, now it depends where it was.

I keep telling you that the WI batting in the 80's wasn't quite what you believe it to be.

There were batches where Logie and Harper played together and Dujon batting at 6.

But appreciate your shifting goal posts.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
So first it was about the runs, now it depends where it was.

I keep telling you that the WI batting in the 80's wasn't quite what you believe it to be.

There were batches where Logie and Harper played together and Dujon batting at 6.

But appreciate your shifting goal posts.
I know it's hard for you to keep up, but it's the same fundamental point. I even stated it earlier in the thread that it's context relevant.

That was a lower scoring era tho so a 350 in the 80s may be a 400-450 in the 2000s.
 

Top