I admire all of those that you mentioned a lot. In many ways, Lillee can be considered the spiritual guru of most pace bowlers after him and even Hadlee idolised him. I took to Hadlee easily because I thought he had a tremendous action and carried the team on his shoulders for years.Ah, could never guess that you're originally from India!
How come Richard Hadlee is your favorite given that his main weapon was inswinger@(not-so-much-)pace? Outswinger@pace username reiminds me of Lillee, Holding and yes, Wasim.
Lillee never swung the ball, IMO. a great seamer, yes, but swing? nah! will fish out an old bob simpson piece on this in sportstar from 15 years ago.Ah, could never guess that you're originally from India!
How come Richard Hadlee is your favorite given that his main weapon was inswinger@(not-so-much-)pace? Outswinger@pace username reiminds me of Lillee, Holding and yes, Wasim.
Lillee was a very good swing bowler. It's another matter that he sometimes under-used swing because he thought it lessens his pace. I read Lillee saying that somewhere but can't find it. But it should follow from the following quote from Lillee:Lillee never swung the ball, IMO. a great seamer, yes, but swing? nah! will fish out an old bob simpson piece on this in sportstar from 15 years ago.
I am pretty sure Lillee was adept as swinging the ball. Never watched him live, but the highlights of almost all of his major bowling spells are on YouTube.Lillee never swung the ball, IMO. a great seamer, yes, but swing? nah! will fish out an old bob simpson piece on this in sportstar from 15 years ago.
great clip.I admire all of those that you mentioned a lot. In many ways, Lillee can be considered the spiritual guru of most pace bowlers after him and even Hadlee idolised him. I took to Hadlee easily because I thought he had a tremendous action and carried the team on his shoulders for years.
He was also quick in his earlier years (with that longer run), before becoming a polished customer. And I was under the impression that Hadlee's best ball was the one that looked to come in a bit and then seamed away after pitching. A conventional inswinger wasn't initially a part of his armoury but after his Nottingham stint (1979 or so), Hadlee became a complete bowler with great command of swing and seam. Still the main mode of his dismissals was getting the right-handers caught behind/ in the slips with ones that swung or seamed away and getting some occasional awkward lift from a compulsive playing channel.
Or so I gathered from what I read and followed of his career. A good example of the master working over batsmen with intelligence and skill:
Richard Hadlee vs Ian Botham- supreme swing bowling, what a master! - YouTube
Please post that article. Lillee did swing the ball. Check how many LBWs/Caught behinds in his dismissals then tell me the ball did not swing. I was fortunate when DKL was recurperating from his extensive physio in Brisbane to have faced him. He was a prodigious swinger of the ball and he was bowling at only one quarter of his pace and this was in warehouse division.( For your info I made only six)Lillee never swung the ball, IMO. a great seamer, yes, but swing? nah! will fish out an old bob simpson piece on this in sportstar from 15 years ago.
Lillee was a very good swing bowler. It's another matter that he sometimes under-used swing because he thought it lessens his pace. I read Lillee saying that somewhere but can't find it. But it should follow from the following quote from Lillee:
"The most critical part of swing bowling is the way you let go of the ball from the hand. If this is not done with a high degree of precision, the ball will not swing at all or will swing only a little and too early in its flight to be any great danger to the batsman. It starts with the grip of the ball, which should be made by contact of the index and middle fingers on the top of the ball and the thumb at the bottom. This contact should be towards the tips of the fingers and the thumb (what we call ‘fingering’ the ball), because if the ball is gripped too deeply in the hand, the critical control needed to send the ball away correctly may be lost. The hand should be directed behind the ball at the point of delivery and must not undercut on either side. The ball is sent away with a natural under-spin, and I believe the more under-spin imparted on the ball the later it will swing. The seam should remain vertical throughout the flight down the wicket "
Good thought that!I’ve moved all Dennis Lillee discussion from the Welcome to Cricket Chat thread to here. I think it’s a great discussion and deserved its own thread.
Well, there we have it from a man who dared to pad up to Lillee. Superb input, good sir and much appreciated!... Lillee did swing the ball. Check how many LBWs/Caught behinds in his dismissals then tell me the ball did not swing. I was fortunate when DKL was recurperating from his extensive physio in Brisbane to have faced him. He was a prodigious swinger of the ball and he was bowling at only one quarter of his pace and this was in warehouse division.( For your info I made only six)
Uh! When I saw a new thread created by me, I thought my account had been hacked!I’ve moved all Dennis Lillee discussion from the Welcome to Cricket Chat thread to here. I think it’s a great discussion and deserved its own thread.
I wouldn't say he had a great yorker either. He could bowl an inswinger but rarely. More often an off cutter.Lillee could definitely swing the new ball when he wanted to. He had pretty much the full toolkit of a fast bowler with the possible exception of an inswinger ( and reverse swing, of course).