CWXI Selection Panel

[marc71178]

You know how the proverb goes, "Too many cooks spoil the broth"

Not so much as it just makes it a lot easier to coordinate with 3 people than with 5!

 

[age_master]

with the 5 that have been duscussing selections recently we have had no trouble coordinating.

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

Not so much as it just makes it a lot easier to coordinate with 3 people than with 5!

And then when 2 don't show up or are unavailable (as has happened countless times in the past), what then? With 5 we have insurance for such a situation to get a comfortable discussion.

 

[Travis_Teh]

And then when 2 don't show up or are unavailable (as has happened countless times in the past), what then? With 5 we have insurance for such a situation to get a comfortable discussion.

Said mishaps don't occur in Marc's little perfect world.

 

[Robertinho]

Anyway, what about new PA Rep elections? Garven's had a long, successful reign, but I think maybe a year on it's time for a change?

The two contenders IMO would be Towns and Fuller - though Towns would probably have to step down from the U-19 panel.

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

If Garven was successful (and he was and is) why can't he be a nominee to retain the post?

 

[Loony BoB]

I don't see why he can't be.

 

[superkingdave]

yeah personally i think Garven has done a good job

 

[age_master]

Thanks

Before any elections are held i think it would be a wise idea to set the term that a PA rep should sit for before new elections are held. 2 seasons (including the off seasons for those seasons) i think would be a reasonable amount of time.

 

[age_master]

Ofcourse that is off topic to this thread too, any further opinions on the makeup of the selection panel?

 

[Travis_Teh]

Garven is teh sux, yo~ Can't even post the correct Green team,

 

[Mr Mxyzptlk]

Garven is teh sux, yo~ Can't even post the correct Green team,

His inadequacy as a captain has nothing to do with his ability as PA Rep.

 

[Magrat Garlick]

Right, so would anyone object strongly if I started a nominations thread tomorrow?

 

[Pratters]

Right, so would anyone object strongly if I started a nominations thread tomorrow?

Has any one ever objected to you?

 

[Magrat Garlick]

Has any one ever objected to you?

There's a time for everything.

The debate still hasn't reached a consensus on three or five members of the selections panel, either, which is a little bit worrying.

 

[steds]

The debate still doesn't reached a consensus

Beg your pardon?

 

[Loony BoB]

I still think five is good, as it allows for the odd person not replying to not hinder any selections. So long as at least three of the five people get involved every time, then I'm happy, but it should never really be done with less, which would probably happen often if there were only three spots.

 

[marc71178]

Has any one ever objected to you?

Have you not watched him bat?!

 

[Jamee999]

I think: An elected Rep of the CONTRACTED players. This is a poll open only for votes by the contracted player, and must be a contracted player (central or secondary). It can not be the captain, Hakon or Liam. An elected Rep of the Players. This is open to all players except Hakon and Liam, but can not be a contracted player (central or secondary). Hakon and Liam. The captain or the coach..

It gives 5, and neither the elected players or the board has the majority.

 

[Robertinho]

I think: An elected Rep of the CONTRACTED players. This is a poll open only for votes by the contracted player, and must be a contracted player (central or secondary). It can not be the captain, Hakon or Liam. An elected Rep of the Players. This is open to all players except Hakon and Liam, but can not be a contracted player (central or secondary). Hakon and Liam. The captain or the coach..

It gives 5, and neither the elected players or the board has the majority.

Why? That wouldn't be any more democratic than any other system proposed. Why give extra power to the contracted players, whilst taking it away from the rest? Makes no sense...